222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26456801)
1. Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.
Barkley C; Kluender R; Kutas M
Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 1629():143-59. PubMed ID: 26456801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in the processing of referential dependencies: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Fiorentino R; Covey L; Gabriele A
Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 673():79-84. PubMed ID: 29444445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Topic shift impairs pronoun resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Xu X; Zhou X
Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 26592503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions.
Molinaro N; Barber HA; Carreiras M
Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):908-30. PubMed ID: 21458791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Event-Related Potentials Accompanying Processing Referentially Ambiguous Pronouns in Russian].
Yurchenko AN; Fedorova OV; Kurgansky AV; Machinskaya RI
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2016 Sep; 66(5):590-599. PubMed ID: 30695404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interplay between referential processing and local syntactic/semantic processing: ERPs to written Chinese discourse.
Yu J; Zhang Y; Boland JE; Cai L
Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1597():139-58. PubMed ID: 25511994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ERPs reveal sensitivity to hypothetical contexts in spoken discourse.
Dwivedi VD; Drury JE; Molnar M; Phillips NA; Baum S; Steinhauer K
Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(11):791-5. PubMed ID: 20574414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphological agreement at a distance: dissociation between early and late components of the event-related brain potential.
O'Rourke PL; Van Petten C
Brain Res; 2011 May; 1392():62-79. PubMed ID: 21466794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age-related differences in understanding pronominal reference in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation.
Lee CL; Lai CH
Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):275-287. PubMed ID: 37650796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An ERP Study of Causative Cleft Construction in Japanese: Evidence for the Preference of Shorter Linear Distance in Sentence Comprehension.
Yano M; Sakamoto T
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):407-21. PubMed ID: 25749432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: an event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance.
Alemán Bañón J; Fiorentino R; Gabriele A
Brain Res; 2012 May; 1456():49-63. PubMed ID: 22520436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.
Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 16956594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse.
Almor A; Nair VA; Boiteau TW; Vendemia JMC
Brain Lang; 2017 Oct; 173():52-66. PubMed ID: 28646665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When word category information encounters morphosyntax: an ERP study.
Rossi S; Gugler MF; Hahne A; Friederici AD
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 15893877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.
Steinhauer K; Drury JE; Portner P; Walenski M; Ullman MT
Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1525-42. PubMed ID: 20138065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: an ERP study.
Li XQ; Yang YF; Lu Y
Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 20083152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anaphoric distance dependencies in visual narrative structure and processing.
Cohn N; van Middelaar L; Foulsham T; Schilperoord J
Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101639. PubMed ID: 38306880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
