179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26457197)
1. The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope.
Lowe J; Cleland CR; Mgaya E; Furahini G; Gilbert CE; Burton MJ; Philippin H
J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():743263. PubMed ID: 26457197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two ophthalmoscopes for direct ophthalmoscopy.
Mandal N; Harborne P; Bradley S; Salmon N; Holder R; Denniston AK; Murray PI
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 20796260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Panoptic versus conventional ophthalmoscope.
McComiskie JE; Greer RM; Gole GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 32(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 15180833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of a novel solar powered low-cost ophthalmoscope (Arclight) by eye healthcare workers in Malawi.
Blundell R; Roberts D; Fioratou E; Abraham C; Msosa J; Chirambo T; Blaikie A
BMJ Innov; 2018 Apr; 4(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 29670760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education.
Gilmour-White JA; Picton A; Blaikie A; Denniston AK; Blanch R; Coleman J; Murray PI
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):201. PubMed ID: 31196068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smartphone Compatible versus Conventional Ophthalmoscope: A Randomized Crossover Educational Trial.
Curtis R; Xu M; Liu D; Kwok J; Hopman W; Irrcher I; Baxter S
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017); 2021 Jul; 13(2):e270-e276. PubMed ID: 37388835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Arclight vs. traditional ophthalmoscope: a cross-over trial.
Hytiris ML; Fioratou E; Gillan SN
Eye (Lond); 2021 Mar; 35(3):831-837. PubMed ID: 32461568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of amblyogenic risk factors with the Brückner reflex test using the low-cost Arclight direct ophthalmoscope.
Tuteja SY; Blaikie A; Kekunnaya R
Eye (Lond); 2021 Nov; 35(11):3007-3011. PubMed ID: 33414528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of medical student accuracy conducting direct ophthalmoscopy with an unmodified iPhone X.
Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Rai AS; Leung VC; Ahmed A; Rai AS
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 42(12):3933-3940. PubMed ID: 35871237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New agreement in assessing vertical cup: disc ratio using a 78D lens with slit-lamp eyepiece measuring graticule].
Zheng Y; He M
Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 23(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 17444042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical cup-to-disc ratio: agreement between direct ophthalmoscopic estimation, fundus biomicroscopic estimation, and scanning laser ophthalmoscopic measurement.
Watkins R; Panchal L; Uddin J; Gunvant P
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 80(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 12808406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison Study of Funduscopic Examination Using a Smartphone-Based Digital Ophthalmoscope and the Direct Ophthalmoscope.
Wu AR; Fouzdar-Jain S; Suh DW
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 May; 55(3):201-206. PubMed ID: 29796680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What optic disc parameters are most accurately assessed using the direct ophthalmoscope?
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):283-7. PubMed ID: 11450721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optic disc assessment in the emergency department: a comparative study between the PanOptic and direct ophthalmoscopes.
Petrushkin H; Barsam A; Mavrakakis M; Parfitt A; Jaye P
Emerg Med J; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1007-8. PubMed ID: 21998469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in U.S. Adults: Prevalence and Association with Glaucoma in the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Qiu M; Boland MV; Ramulu PY
Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug; 124(8):1229-1236. PubMed ID: 28545734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical Note: A comparison of a novel direct ophthalmoscope, the Optyse, to conventional direct ophthalmoscopes.
Harle DE; Davies K; Shah R; Hussain S; Cowling S; Panesar TK; Bourton J; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 17239196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arclight: a pocket ophthalmoscope for the 21st century.
Blaikie A; Sandford-Smith J; Tuteja SY; Williams CD; O'Callaghan C
BMJ; 2016 Dec; 355():i6637. PubMed ID: 27974424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cup-to-disc ratio: ophthalmoscopy versus automated measurement in a general population: The Rotterdam Study.
Wolfs RC; Ramrattan RS; Hofman A; de Jong PT
Ophthalmology; 1999 Aug; 106(8):1597-601. PubMed ID: 10442909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement in assessing cup-to-disc ratio measurement among stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs, HRT II, and Stratus OCT.
Arthur SN; Aldridge AJ; De León-Ortega J; McGwin G; Xie A; Girkin CA
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16778638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy vs conventional direct ophthalmoscopy as a teaching tool for medical students: the COSMOS study.
Kim Y; Chao DL
Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():391-401. PubMed ID: 30858689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
