These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Effect of postoperative partial bladder filling after minimally invasive hysterectomy on postanesthesia care unit discharge and cost: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Moawad G; Tyan P; Marfori C; Abi Khalil E; Park D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):367.e1-367.e7. PubMed ID: 30639089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseases. Sirisabya N; Manchana T J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jan; 34(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 24359054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Deimling TA; Eldridge JL; Riley KA; Kunselman AR; Harkins GJ Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 28099699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Yi YX; Zhang W; Zhou Q; Guo WR; Su Y Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 21664034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mortality Rates in Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Behbehani S; Suarez-Salvador E; Buras M; Magtibay P; Magrina J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):603-612.e1. PubMed ID: 31627007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Hoffmann E; Bennich G; Larsen CR; Lindschou J; Jakobsen JC; Lassen PD BMC Womens Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):76. PubMed ID: 28882141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infectious complications of laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Marra AR; Puig-Asensio M; Edmond MB; Schweizer ML; Bender D Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):518-530. PubMed ID: 30833440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sandberg EM; la Chapelle CF; van den Tweel MM; Schoones JW; Jansen FW Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1089-1103. PubMed ID: 28357561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]