These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26457851)

  • 21. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases.
    Claerhout F; Deprest J
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 19(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 15985252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The benefits and challenges of robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Smorgick N; As-Sanie S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 26(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 24914631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy.
    Buderath P; Kimmig R
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26605432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions.
    Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.
    Bretschneider CE; Jallad K; Paraiso MFR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 28177208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of life in patients who undergo conventional or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Rodrigues RC; Rodrigues MRK; Freitas NO; Rudge MVC; Lima SAM
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15974. PubMed ID: 31169730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in women aged 65 years or older: propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Lazzarini C; Ghezzi F
    Menopause; 2015 Jan; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 24977457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abdominal Hysterectomy: Reduced Risk of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique.
    Colling KP; Glover JK; Statz CA; Geller MA; Beilman GJ
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2015 Oct; 16(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 26070101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accessibility and surgical outcomes of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy using straight instruments for hysterectomy in difficult conditions.
    Huang CY; Wu KY; Su H; Han CM; Wu PJ; Wang CJ; Lee CL; Yen CF
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 25510685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pelosi minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a non-endoscopic minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Pelosi MA; Pelosi MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():157-67. PubMed ID: 15744686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy.
    Cela V; Marrucci E; Angioni S; Freschi L
    Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 29856186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Mendise TJ; Roulette GD; von Gruenigen VE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):593-4. PubMed ID: 23871948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; von Felten S; Schär G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 22914470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subtotal Hysterectomy with Single Port Access Laparoscopy: Gadget or Progress?
    Abo C; Roman H
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2016; 111(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 27172528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes.
    Igwe E; Hernandez E; Rose S; Uppal S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24949539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to hysterectomy in the obese.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Serati M; Di Naro E; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Uccella S; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Marconi N; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():85-90. PubMed ID: 25898369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.