BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26458106)

  • 1. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
    Arponen O; Sudah M; Masarwah A; Taina M; Rautiainen S; Könönen M; Sironen R; Kosma VM; Sutela A; Hakumäki J; Vanninen R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0138702. PubMed ID: 26458106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value.
    Gity M; Moradi B; Arami R; Arabkheradmand A; Kazemi MA
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Oct; 19(10):2765-2770. PubMed ID: 30360604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis be helpful to evaluate breast phyllode tumor grades?
    Guo Y; Tang WJ; Kong QC; Liang YY; Han XR; Zheng BJ; Sun L; Wei XH; Jin Z; Liu CL
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():25-31. PubMed ID: 31005172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Luminal-type breast cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients with the Ki-67 labeling index.
    Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Ishida T; Watanabe G; Tada H; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25203132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI.
    Tan SL; Rahmat K; Rozalli FI; Mohd-Shah MN; Aziz YF; Yip CH; Vijayananthan A; Ng KH
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Jan; 69(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24156797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
    Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.
    Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings.
    Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Fine SW; Zhang J; Inurrigarro G; Moskowitz CS; Ishill NM; Reuter VE; Touijer K; Zakian KL; Koutcher JA
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18227542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
    Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
    Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.
    Nogueira L; Brandão S; Matos E; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25698095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
    Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
    Partridge SC; Mullins CD; Kurland BF; Allain MD; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1664-73. PubMed ID: 20489111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.
    Barentsz MW; Taviani V; Chang JM; Ikeda DM; Miyake KK; Banerjee S; van den Bosch MA; Hargreaves BA; Daniel BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1656-65. PubMed ID: 25914178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
    Peters NH; Vincken KL; van den Bosch MA; Luijten PR; Mali WP; Bartels LW
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 20432344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
    Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.