58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26458586)
1. Assessment of target volume doses in radiotherapy based on the standard and measured calibration curves.
Mohammadi GF; Alam NR; Rezaeejam H; Pourfallah TA; Zakariaee SS
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(3):586-91. PubMed ID: 26458586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.
Hatton J; McCurdy B; Greer PB
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N329-46. PubMed ID: 19590116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy Dependence of Measured CT Numbers on Substituted Materials Used for CT Number Calibration of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Systems.
Mahmoudi R; Jabbari N; Aghdasi M; Khalkhali HR
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158828. PubMed ID: 27391672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of computed tomography number-relative electron density conversion curve on the calculation of radiotherapy dose and evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system.
Hasani M; Farhood B; Ghorbani M; Naderi H; Saadatmand S; Karimkhani Zandi S; Knaup C
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Jun; 42(2):489-502. PubMed ID: 30848440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration.
Rong Y; Smilowitz J; Tewatia D; Tomé WA; Paliwal B
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 19931031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dependence of computed tomography number to relative electron density conversion on phantom geometry and its impact on planned dose.
Inness EK; Moutrie V; Charles PH
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 37(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 24760737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT number calibration audit in photon radiation therapy.
Nakao M; Ozawa S; Miura H; Yamada K; Hayata M; Hayashi K; Kawahara D; Nakashima T; Ochi Y; Okumura T; Kunimoto H; Kawakubo A; Kusaba H; Nozaki H; Habara K; Tohyama N; Nishio T; Nakamura M; Minemura T; Okamoto H; Ishikawa M; Kurooka M; Shimizu H; Hotta K; Saito M; Nakano M; Tsuneda M; Nagata Y
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1571-1582. PubMed ID: 38112216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Calibration of CT values used for radiation treatment planning and its impact factors].
Qi ZY; Huang SM; Deng XW
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jan; 25(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 16405763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity study for CT image use in Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Verhaegen F; Devic S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):937-46. PubMed ID: 15798266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.
Langen KM; Meeks SL; Poole DO; Wagner TH; Willoughby TR; Kupelian PA; Ruchala KJ; Haimerl J; Olivera GH
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(18):4259-76. PubMed ID: 16148392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient specific optimization of the relation between CT-hounsfield units and proton stopping power with proton radiography.
Schneider U; Pemler P; Besserer J; Pedroni E; Lomax A; Kaser-Hotz B
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 15719970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A formulation of tissue- and water-equivalent materials using the stoichiometric analysis method for CT-number calibration in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yohannes I; Kolditz D; Langner O; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1173-90. PubMed ID: 22330195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)].
Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C
Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of CT image noise on proton range calculation in radiotherapy planning.
Chvetsov AV; Paige SL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(6):N141-9. PubMed ID: 20182006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gemstone spectral imaging: determination of CT to ED conversion curves for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Yagi M; Ueguchi T; Koizumi M; Ogata T; Yamada S; Takahashi Y; Sumida I; Akino Y; Konishi K; Isohashi F; Tomiyama N; Yoshioka Y; Ogawa K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):173-86. PubMed ID: 24036870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
Guan H; Dong H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
