These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26458732)

  • 1. Vaginal electrohysterography: the design and preliminary evaluation of a novel device for uterine contraction monitoring in an ovine model (.).
    Sunwoo N; Hwang K; Blakemore KJ; Aina-Mumuney A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(17):2742-7. PubMed ID: 26458732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel uterine contraction monitoring to enable remote, self-administered nonstress testing.
    Schwartz N; Mhajna M; Moody HL; Zahar Y; Shkolnik K; Reches A; Lowery CL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 226(4):554.e1-554.e12. PubMed ID: 34762863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 26960704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of uterine activity using the Term Guard monitor versus standard external tocodynamometry compared with the intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Hess LW; McCaul JF; Perry KG; Howard PR; Morrison JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 2359580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index and Gestational Age on the Detection of Uterine Contractions by Tocodynamometry: A Retrospective Study.
    Aina-Mumuney A; Hwang K; Sunwoo N; Burd I; Blakemore K
    Reprod Sci; 2016 May; 23(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 26499394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noninvasive monitoring of uterine electrical activity among patients with obesity: a new external monitoring device.
    Moni SS; Kirshenbaum R; Comfort L; Kuba K; Wolfe D; Xie X; Negassa A; Bernstein PS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100375. PubMed ID: 33852969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor.
    Hadar E; Biron-Shental T; Gavish O; Raban O; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25123517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of measured external tocodynamometry with measured internal uterine activity.
    Paul MJ; Smeltzer JS
    Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):417-20. PubMed ID: 1814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical assessment of uterine contractions.
    Cohen WR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 139(2):137-142. PubMed ID: 28727889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A validation study of home uterine activity monitoring technology in Western Australia.
    Dickinson JE; Godfrey M; Legge M; Evans SF
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Feb; 37(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9075545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative assessment of interpretability and observer agreement of three uterine monitoring techniques.
    Thijssen KMJ; Tissink JGLJ; Dieleman JP; Van der Hout-van der Jagt MB; Westerhuis MEMH; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Dec; 255():142-146. PubMed ID: 33129016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monitoring contractions in obese parturients: electrohysterography compared with traditional monitoring.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Marossero D; Edwards RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1136-40. PubMed ID: 17470595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; McGorray SP; Euliano N; Onkala A; Gregg AR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):66.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23122926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential use of electrohysterography in obstetrics: a review article.
    Huber C; Shazly SA; Ruano R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 May; 34(10):1666-1672. PubMed ID: 31303075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of electrohysterography as method of monitoring uterine contractions during labor: A propensity score matched study.
    Frenken MWE; Thijssen KMJ; Vlemminx MWC; van den Heuvel ER; Westerhuis MEMH; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():178-184. PubMed ID: 33684672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Electrohysterography, a promising alternative for uterine monitoring: 5 years later].
    Frenken MWE; Vlemminx MWC; van der Woude DAA; van Laar JOEH; Guid Oei S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2021 Aug; 165():. PubMed ID: 34351715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients.
    Miles AM; Monga M; Richeson KS
    Am J Perinatol; 2001 May; 18(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11414523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.