These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26458902)

  • 1. Uncertainty Propagation in Nerve Impulses Through the Action Potential Mechanism.
    Torres Valderrama A; Witteveen J; Navarro M; Blom J
    J Math Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 5(1):3. PubMed ID: 26458902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic solvers enable a straight-forward exploration of numerical uncertainty in neuroscience models.
    Oesterle J; Krämer N; Hennig P; Berens P
    J Comput Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 50(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 35932442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thinking about the nerve impulse: A critical analysis of the electricity-centered conception of nerve excitability.
    Drukarch B; Holland HA; Velichkov M; Geurts JJG; Voorn P; Glas G; de Regt HW
    Prog Neurobiol; 2018 Oct; 169():172-185. PubMed ID: 29981394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in a model of the carotid bifurcation: Identification and ranking of most sensitive model parameters.
    Gul R; Bernhard S
    Math Biosci; 2015 Nov; 269():104-16. PubMed ID: 26367184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on the asymptotic reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations for nerve impulses.
    Hinch R
    Bull Math Biol; 2005 Sep; 67(5):947-55. PubMed ID: 15998489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A stochastic collocation approach for parabolic PDEs with random domain deformations.
    Castrillón-Candás JE; Xu J
    Comput Math Appl; 2021 Jul; 93():32-49. PubMed ID: 34113061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of analytical and sampling-based uncertainty propagation in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Wahl N; Hennig P; Wieser HP; Bangert M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5790-5807. PubMed ID: 28649976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty analysis of ventricular mechanics using the probabilistic collocation method.
    Osnes H; Sundnes J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 59(8):2171-9. PubMed ID: 22581129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations.
    Sankaran S; Marsden AL
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031001. PubMed ID: 21303177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hybrid collocation-perturbation approach for PDEs with random domains.
    Castrillón-Candás JE; Nobile F; Tempone RF
    Adv Comput Math; 2021 Jun; 47(3):. PubMed ID: 34305359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainty Quantification of Film Cooling Performance of an Industrial Gas Turbine Vane.
    Gamannossi A; Amerini A; Mazzei L; Bacci T; Poggiali M; Andreini A
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33285791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Channel noise effects on first spike latency of a stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron.
    Maisel B; Lindenberg K
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Feb; 95(2-1):022414. PubMed ID: 28297877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions.
    Conrad PR; Girolami M; Särkkä S; Stuart A; Zygalakis K
    Stat Comput; 2017; 27(4):1065-1082. PubMed ID: 32226237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-fidelity modelling via recursive co-kriging and Gaussian-Markov random fields.
    Perdikaris P; Venturi D; Royset JO; Karniadakis GE
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Jul; 471(2179):20150018. PubMed ID: 26345079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic Behavior of Artificial Hodgkin-Huxley Neuron Model Subject to Additive Noise.
    Kang Q; Huang B; Zhou M
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2016 Sep; 46(9):2083-93. PubMed ID: 26292356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-phase and anti-phase synchronization in noisy Hodgkin-Huxley neurons.
    Ao X; Hänggi P; Schmid G
    Math Biosci; 2013 Sep; 245(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 23473940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical solutions of the Frankenhaeuser-Huxley equations I: minimal model for backpropagation of action potentials in sparsely excitable dendrites.
    Poznanski RR
    J Integr Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 3(3):267-99. PubMed ID: 15366097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchronization of stochastic mean field networks of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons with noisy channels.
    Bossy M; Fontbona J; Olivero H
    J Math Biol; 2019 May; 78(6):1771-1820. PubMed ID: 30734076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Computational Neuroscience.
    Tennøe S; Halnes G; Einevoll GT
    Front Neuroinform; 2018; 12():49. PubMed ID: 30154710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation-based uncertainty quantification of human arterial network hemodynamics.
    Chen P; Quarteroni A; Rozza G
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Jun; 29(6):698-721. PubMed ID: 23653286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.