These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26459153)

  • 1. How modality specific is processing of auditory and visual rhythms?
    Pasinski AC; McAuley JD; Snyder JS
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 26459153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modality-dependent "what" and "where" preparatory processes in auditory and visual systems.
    Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20350168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The whole is more than the sum of its parts - audiovisual processing of phonemes investigated with ERPs.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Stowe L; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2013 Mar; 124(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 23395711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality specificity of evoked potential augmenting/reducing.
    Blenner JL; Yingling CD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 7681754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender related differences in visual and auditory processing of verbal and figural tasks.
    Jausovec N; Jausovec K
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():135-45. PubMed ID: 19747461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nicotine receptor gene CHRNA4 modulates early event-related potentials in auditory and visual oddball target detection tasks.
    Espeseth T; Endestad T; Rootwelt H; Reinvang I
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jul; 147(4):974-85. PubMed ID: 17590520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What's in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences.
    Besson M; Faita F; Czternasty C; Kutas M
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 9255429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Time-shrinking perception' in the visual system: a psychophysical and high-density ERP study.
    Nagaike A; Mitsudo T; Nakajima Y; Ogata K; Yamasaki T; Goto Y; Tobimatsu S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3279-3290. PubMed ID: 27401472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.
    Van der Molen MJ; Van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR; Hamel BC; Curfs LM; Ramakers GJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):720-9. PubMed ID: 21958658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-visual processing represented in the human superior temporal gyrus.
    Reale RA; Calvert GA; Thesen T; Jenison RL; Kawasaki H; Oya H; Howard MA; Brugge JF
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 17241747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexicality and modality effects on evoked potentials in a memory-scanning task.
    Pratt H; Erez A; Geva AB
    Brain Lang; 1994 Apr; 46(3):353-67. PubMed ID: 8193910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dorsal auditory pathway is involved in performance of both visual and auditory rhythms.
    Karabanov A; Blom O; Forsman L; Ullén F
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18848999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive potentials in the basal ganglia-frontocortical circuits. An intracerebral recording study.
    Rektor I; Bares M; Kanovský P; Brázdil M; Klajblová I; Streitová H; Rektorová I; Sochůrková D; Kubová D; Kuba R; Daniel P
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 15221170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.
    Dyson BJ; Alain C; He Y
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 5(3):319-38. PubMed ID: 16396093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching.
    Escera C; Yago E; Corral MJ; Corbera S; Nuñez MI
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Oct; 18(8):2408-12. PubMed ID: 14622204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.