321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26459631)
1. Monte Carlo-based noise compensation in coil intensity corrected endorectal MRI.
Lui D; Modhafar A; Haider MA; Wong A
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Oct; 15():43. PubMed ID: 26459631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noise-Compensated, Bias-Corrected Diffusion Weighted Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging via a Stochastically Fully-Connected Joint Conditional Random Field Model.
Boroomand A; Shafiee MJ; Khalvati F; Haider MA; Wong A
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2587-2597. PubMed ID: 27392347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of a multichannel endorectal RF coil for prostate MRI at 7T in combination with an external surface array.
Ertürk MA; Tian J; Van de Moortele PF; Adriany G; Metzger GJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1279-87. PubMed ID: 26584144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo bias field correction in endorectal diffusion imaging.
Lui D; Modhafar A; Glaister J; Wong A; Haider MA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Feb; 61(2):368-80. PubMed ID: 24448596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient quantification using a fully automatic noise bias compensation method: Preliminary evaluation in prostate diffusion weighted imaging.
Zhong X; Dale BM; Nickel MD; Kannengiesser SAR; Kiefer B; Bashir M
J Magn Reson; 2019 Aug; 305():22-30. PubMed ID: 31158792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved performance of prostate DCE-MRI using a 32-coil vs. 12-coil receiver array.
Riederer SJ; Borisch EA; Froemming AT; Grimm RC; Kawashima A; Mynderse LA; Trzasko JD
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():15-23. PubMed ID: 28132859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study.
Lian J; Xing L; Hunjan S; Dumoulin C; Levin J; Lo A; Watkins R; Rohling K; Giaquinto R; Kim D; Spielman D; Daniel B
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3087-94. PubMed ID: 15587662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Novel Three-Channel Endorectal Coil for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T.
Mo Z; Zhang X; Liang H; Chen Q; Tie C; Xiao W; Cao Q; Liu C; Zou C; Wan L; Zhang X; Li Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 70(12):3381-3388. PubMed ID: 37318962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality Comparison of 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI of the prostate using a flexible surface receiver coil versus conventional surface coil plus endorectal coil setup.
Ullrich T; Kohli MD; Ohliger MA; Magudia K; Arora SS; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Margolis DJ; Schimmöller L; Turkbey B; Westphalen AC
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4260-4270. PubMed ID: 32696213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phased-array MRI of canine prostate using endorectal and endourethral coils.
Yung AC; Oner AY; Serfaty JM; Feneley M; Yang X; Atalar E
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Apr; 49(4):710-5. PubMed ID: 12652542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate imaging: evaluation of a reusable two-channel endorectal receiver coil for MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Haider MA; Krieger A; Elliott C; Da Rosa MR; Milot L
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):556-65. PubMed ID: 24471393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?-A Review.
Lee G; Oto A; Giurcanu M
Life (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35455060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation induced current in the RF coils of integrated linac-MR systems: the effect of buildup and magnetic field.
Burke B; Ghila A; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5004-14. PubMed ID: 22894426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parallel imaging compressed sensing for accelerated imaging and improved signal-to-noise ratio in MRI-based postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Sanders JW; Song H; Frank SJ; Bathala T; Venkatesan AM; Anscher M; Tang C; Bruno TL; Wei W; Ma J
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):816-824. PubMed ID: 29880449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-dose computed tomography via spatially adaptive Monte-Carlo reconstruction.
Lui D; Cameron A; Modhafar A; Cho DS; Wong A
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013; 37(7-8):438-49. PubMed ID: 23816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
