These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26459751)

  • 1. A cross-platform survey of CT image quality and dose from routine abdomen protocols and a method to systematically standardize image quality.
    Favazza CP; Duan X; Zhang Y; Yu L; Leng S; Kofler JM; Bruesewitz MR; McCollough CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8381-97. PubMed ID: 26459751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
    Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Cheebsumon P; Pengpan T
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 27977415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems.
    Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of image quality among different detector configurations using area detector computed tomography.
    Miura Y; Ichikawa K; Fujimura I; Hara T; Hoshino T; Niwa S; Funahashi M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Mar; 11(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 29297139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of focal spot blooming on high-contrast spatial resolution in CT imaging.
    Grimes J; Duan X; Yu L; Halaweish AF; Haag N; Leng S; McCollough C
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6011-20. PubMed ID: 26429276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ABDOMEN-PELVIS COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PROTOCOL OPTIMIZATION: AN IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE ASSESSMENT.
    Pelegrino Bastos Maués NH; Fattori Alves AF; Menegatti Pavan AL; Marrone Ribeiro S; Yamashita S; Petean Trindade A; Mascarenhas YM; Nicolucci P; Rodrigues de Pina D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30371858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for characterizing and matching CT image quality across CT scanners from different manufacturers.
    Winslow J; Zhang Y; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5705-5717. PubMed ID: 28865170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Omotayo A; Elbakri I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size-specific optimization of CT protocols based on minimum detectability.
    Zhang Y; Smitherman C; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1301-1311. PubMed ID: 28122119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of CT parameters on the physical quantities related to image quality for two MDCT scanners using the ACR accreditation phantom: A phantom study.
    Alikhani B; Jamali L; Raatschen HJ; Wacker F; Werncke T
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 28687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective evaluation of the contrast, radiation dose and image quality of contrast-enhanced CT scans of paediatric abdomens using a low-concentration iodinated contrast agent and low tube voltage combined with 70% ASIR algorithm.
    Wang X; Zhong Y; Hu L; Xue L; Shi M; Qiu H; Li J
    Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Sep; 70 Suppl 9B():B16-21. PubMed ID: 27577509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harmonization of technical image quality in computed tomography: comparison between different reconstruction algorithms and kernels from six scanners.
    Juntunen MAK; Rautiainen J; Hänninen NE; Kotiaho AO
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35320794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.
    Li Y; Jiang Y; Liu H; Yu X; Chen S; Ma D; Gao J; Wu Y
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jan; 12(1):766-780. PubMed ID: 34993117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner.
    Husby E; Svendsen ED; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):224-231. PubMed ID: 28921910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
    McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.