These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26459788)

  • 1. Incremental prognostic value of MRI in the staging of early cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature.
    Bourgioti C; Chatoupis K; Rodolakis A; Antoniou A; Tzavara C; Koutoulidis V; Moulopoulos LA
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 26459788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
    Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
    Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
    Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
    Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
    Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term Outcomes of MRI Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.
    Yoon A; Park JJ; Park BK; Lee YY; Paik ES; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Kim CK; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1252-7. PubMed ID: 27284726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI.
    Merz J; Bossart M; Bamberg F; Eisenblaetter M
    Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 32731266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
    Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) first-order statistics and texture features in clinical staging of cervical cancers.
    Guan Y; Li W; Jiang Z; Zhang B; Chen Y; Huang X; Zhang J; Liu S; He J; Zhou Z; Ge Y
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):951-958. PubMed ID: 28728757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound.
    Perniola G; Fischetti M; Tomao F; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Santangelo G; Lecce F; Piccioni MG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
    Oncology; 2020; 98(9):603-611. PubMed ID: 32492692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study.
    Knoth J; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Fokdal L; Sturdza A; Hoskin P; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Wiebe E; Rai B; Cooper R; van der Steen-Banasik E; van Limbergen E; Pieters BR; Sundset M; Tan LT; Nout RA; Tanderup K; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 32798000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A volumetric analysis of GTV
    Jastaniyah N; Yoshida K; Tanderup K; Lindegaard JC; Sturdza A; Kirisits C; Šegedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Banerjee S; Pötter R;
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):404-411. PubMed ID: 27452409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Predictive Model for Parametrial Invasion in Patients With FIGO Stage IB Cervical Cancer: Individualized Approach for Primary Treatment.
    Kong TW; Piao X; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 26512782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
    Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the proximal extension of early stage cervical cancer to the internal os.
    Bipat S; van den Berg RA; van der Velden J; Stoker J; Spijkerboer AM
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19576711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
    Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
    Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.