These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2646032)

  • 1. Proficiency testing in a medical-needs context.
    Lott JA; Manning NR; Kyler MK
    Clin Chem; 1989 Mar; 35(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 2646032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of computer modeling to predict the magnitude of intralaboratory error tolerated by proposed CDC interlaboratory proficiency testing performance criteria.
    Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS
    Clin Chem; 1988 Sep; 34(9):1849-53. PubMed ID: 2843307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proficiency testing performance: a case study with modeling.
    Waugh JM; Collier CP; Day AG; Waugh M; Raymond MJ
    Clin Biochem; 2002 Sep; 35(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 12413605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy verification and identification of matrix effects. The College of American Pathologists' Protocol.
    Eckfeldt JH; Copeland KR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 8466401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proficiency testing as a regulatory device: a CAP perspective.
    Hamlin W
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1234-6; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State of the art in trueness and interlaboratory harmonization for 10 analytes in general clinical chemistry.
    Miller WG; Myers GL; Ashwood ER; Killeen AA; Wang E; Ehlers GW; Hassemer D; Lo SF; Seccombe D; Siekmann L; Thienpont LM; Toth A
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 May; 132(5):838-46. PubMed ID: 18466033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intralaboratory performance requirements necessary to pass proficiency testing: CAP-1990 vs CLIA-1967 (March 14, 1990) formats compared.
    Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS; Leinweber JE
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jun; 38(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 1597015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
    Ross JW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proficiency testing from a total quality management perspective.
    Castañeda-Méndez K
    Clin Chem; 1992 May; 38(5):615-8. PubMed ID: 1582009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of actual proficiency-testing performance under CLIA '67 (March 14, 1990) rules: perspective from the first year's data.
    Lanphear BJ; Burmeister BJ; Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH; Hassemer DJ
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1254-9; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
    Fraser CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.
    Harris EK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 3355343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How good are clinical laboratories? An assessment of current performance.
    Rej R; Jenny RW
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1210-7; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of problem analytes in a single proficiency test challenge in the absence of the Health Care Financing Administration rule violations.
    Cembrowski GS; Hackney JR; Carey N
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 8466413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twenty-five years of proficiency testing for clinical laboratories.
    Sunderman FW
    Ann Clin Lab Sci (1971); 1972; 2(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 4563231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria.
    Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL
    Clin Chem; 1994 Jul; 40(7 Pt 1):1228-32. PubMed ID: 8013091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Governmental perspectives on evaluating laboratory performance.
    Boone DJ
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1461-5; discussion 1466-7. PubMed ID: 8330408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Charts of operational process specifications ("OPSpecs charts") for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1226-33; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.