These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26460496)
1. [Validation of Subjective Estimates of Female Breast Volume and Comparison with Objective Methods]. Henseler H; Hille-Betz U; Vogt PM Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2015 Dec; 47(6):371-7. PubMed ID: 26460496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Error assessment of subjective estimates of linear breast dimensions versus the objective method. Karavasili P; Henseler H Ger Med Sci; 2024; 22():Doc07. PubMed ID: 39224664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation. Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective breast symmetry analysis with the breast analyzing tool (BAT): improved tool for clinical trials. Krois W; Romar AK; Wild T; Dubsky P; Exner R; Panhofer P; Jakesz R; Gnant M; Fitzal F Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):421-427. PubMed ID: 28466122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume. Hansson E; Manjer J; Ringberg A J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2014 Aug; 48(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 24328899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging]. Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23402935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model. Vegesna A; Raju R; Asfari W; Korimilli A; Varia A; Orfanidis N; Gaughan J; Ramzan Z; Miller LS Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Oct; 64(4):635-40. PubMed ID: 16996361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BreastIdea Volume Estimator: A New Tool for Breast Volume Estimation-Presentation and Validation for Women. Kasielska-Trojan A; Mikołajczyk M; Antoszewski B Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):744e-748e. PubMed ID: 33234954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of orchidometry in boys with varicocele. Kurtz MP; Migliozzi M; Rosoklija I; Zurakowski D; Diamond DA J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Aug; 11(4):185.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25910796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis. Fitzal F; Krois W; Trischler H; Wutzel L; Riedl O; Kühbelböck U; Wintersteiner B; Cardoso MJ; Dubsky P; Gnant M; Jakesz R; Wild T Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 17382546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. Kalbhen CL; McGill JJ; Fendley PM; Corrigan KW; Angelats J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1643-9. PubMed ID: 10584814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes. Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software. Kauffmann C; Tang A; Therasse E; Giroux MF; Elkouri S; Melanson P; Melanson B; Oliva VL; Soulez G Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1688-94. PubMed ID: 21601403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasm size using CT volumetry, spherical and ellipsoid formulas: validation study. Chalian H; Seyal AR; Rezai P; Töre HG; Miller FH; Bentrem DJ; Yaghmai V JOP; 2014 Jan; 15(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 24413780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved reproducibility of right ventricular volumes and function estimation from cardiac magnetic resonance images using level-set models. Catalano O; Corsi C; Antonaci S; Moro G; Mussida M; Frascaroli M; Baldi M; Caiani E; Lamberti C; Cobelli F Magn Reson Med; 2007 Mar; 57(3):600-5. PubMed ID: 17326180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]