These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26460610)

  • 1. Comparing Angular and Curved Shapes in Terms of Implicit Associations and Approach/Avoidance Responses.
    Palumbo L; Ruta N; Bertamini M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140043. PubMed ID: 26460610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?
    Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Gheorghes TN; Galatsidas M
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):154-78. PubMed ID: 25871463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An advantage for smooth compared with angular contours in the speed of processing shape.
    Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Redies C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1304-1318. PubMed ID: 31282695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular Versus Curved Shapes: Correspondences and Emotional Processing.
    Blazhenkova O; Kumar MM
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):67-89. PubMed ID: 28927319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When symmetric and curved visual contour meet intentional instructions: Hedonic value and preference.
    Chuquichambi EG; Corradi GB; Munar E; Rosselló-Mir J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Sep; 74(9):1525-1541. PubMed ID: 34011228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit evaluations and physiological threat responses in people with persistent low back pain and fear of bending.
    Caneiro JP; O'Sullivan P; Smith A; Moseley GL; Lipp OV
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Oct; 17():355-366. PubMed ID: 29031589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating implicit wanting from implicit liking: Development and validation of the Wanting Implicit Association Test (W-IAT).
    Koranyi N; Grigutsch LA; Algermissen J; Rothermund K
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():165-169. PubMed ID: 27568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects.
    Leder H; Tinio PP; Bar M
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 21936294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Curve Appeal: Exploring Individual Differences in Preference for Curved Versus Angular Objects.
    Cotter KN; Silvia PJ; Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Vartanian O
    Iperception; 2017; 8(2):2041669517693023. PubMed ID: 28491269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of presentation time on preference for curvature of real objects and meaningless novel patterns.
    Corradi G; Rosselló-Mir J; Vañó J; Chuquichambi E; Bertamini M; Munar E
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Nov; 110(4):670-685. PubMed ID: 30536967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.
    Hurtado E; Haye A; González R; Manes F; Ibáñez A
    BMC Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 10():69. PubMed ID: 19558689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the approach avoidance compatibility effect moderated by word imageability?
    Pillaud N; Ballot C; Robert C; Mathey S; Ric F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 37649391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.
    Chuquichambi EG; Palumbo L; Rey C; Munar E
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11772. PubMed ID: 34268016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The shape of the pill: Perceived effects, evoked bodily sensations and emotions.
    Blazhenkova O; Dogerlioglu-Demir K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238378. PubMed ID: 32898184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of gender and academic degree on preference for smooth curvature of abstract shapes.
    Palumbo L; Rampone G; Bertamini M
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10877. PubMed ID: 33732544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and recognition of angular frequency patterns.
    Wilson HR; Propp R
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt A):51-6. PubMed ID: 25782363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of curves.
    Zusne L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Oct; 41(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 1187304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contextual malleability of approach-avoidance training effects: approaching or avoiding fear conditioned stimuli modulates effects of approach-avoidance training.
    Mertens G; Van Dessel P; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 28345433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminating between the effects of valence and salience in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2251-75. PubMed ID: 21722058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does emotional valence affect performance in non-emotional categorization tasks?
    Rinck M; Becker ES
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 40(3):385-98. PubMed ID: 19362704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.