These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
588 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26460998)
1. Fast Biological Modeling for Voxel-based Heavy Ion Treatment Planning Using the Mechanistic Repair-Misrepair-Fixation Model and Nuclear Fragment Spectra. Kamp F; Cabal G; Mairani A; Parodi K; Wilkens JJ; Carlson DJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(3):557-68. PubMed ID: 26460998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy. Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of mechanism-inspired models for particle relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Stewart RD; Carlson DJ; Butkus MP; Hawkins R; Friedrich T; Scholz M Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e925-e952. PubMed ID: 30421808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EUD-based biological optimization for carbon ion therapy. Brüningk SC; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6248-57. PubMed ID: 26520717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid implementation of the repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model facilitating online adaption of radiosensitivity parameters in ion therapy. Kamp F; Carlson DJ; Wilkens JJ Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(13):N285-N296. PubMed ID: 28561011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal lobe reactions after carbon ion radiation therapy: comparison of relative biological effectiveness-weighted tolerance doses predicted by local effect models I and IV. Gillmann C; Jäkel O; Schlampp I; Karger CP Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1136-41. PubMed ID: 24661667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A mechanistic relative biological effectiveness model-based biological dose optimization for charged particle radiobiology studies. Guan F; Geng C; Carlson DJ; Ma DH; Bronk L; Gates D; Wang X; Kry SF; Grosshans D; Mohan R Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015008. PubMed ID: 30523805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of variance-based uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to biological modeling in carbon ion treatment plans. Kamp F; Wilkens JJ Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 30471124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with the local effect model for biological calculations in carbon ion therapy. Mairani A; Brons S; Cerutti F; Fassò A; Ferrari A; Krämer M; Parodi K; Scholz M; Sommerer F Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4273-89. PubMed ID: 20647603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical note: Impact of beamline-specific particle energy spectra on clinical plans in carbon ion beam therapy. Resch AF; Schafasand M; Lackner N; Niessen T; Beck S; Elia A; Boersma D; Grevillot L; Fossati P; Glimelius L; Stock M; Georg D; Carlino A Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):4092-4098. PubMed ID: 35416302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variance-based sensitivity analysis of biological uncertainties in carbon ion therapy. Kamp F; Brüningk S; Cabal G; Mairani A; Parodi K; Wilkens JJ Phys Med; 2014 Jul; 30(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 24870245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy. Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break. Wang CC; Hsiao Y; Lee CC; Chao TC; Wang CC; Tung CJ Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for uncertainties in proton therapy: A framework to assess the effect of simultaneous uncertainties in range, positioning, and RBE model predictions on RBE-weighted dose distributions. Hofmaier J; Dedes G; Carlson DJ; Parodi K; Belka C; Kamp F Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):805-818. PubMed ID: 33210739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: a planning study to compare NIRS and LEM approaches with a clinically-oriented strategy. Fossati P; Molinelli S; Matsufuji N; Ciocca M; Mirandola A; Mairani A; Mizoe J; Hasegawa A; Imai R; Kamada T; Orecchia R; Tsujii H Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7543-54. PubMed ID: 23104051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric accuracy and radiobiological implications of ion computed tomography for proton therapy treatment planning. Meyer S; Kamp F; Tessonnier T; Mairani A; Belka C; Carlson DJ; Gianoli C; Parodi K Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125008. PubMed ID: 30870831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo simulations of the relative biological effectiveness for DNA double strand breaks from 300 MeV u(-1) carbon-ion beams. Huang YW; Pan CY; Hsiao YY; Chao TC; Lee CC; Tung CJ Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5995-6012. PubMed ID: 26183156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A trichrome beam model for biological dose calculation in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning. Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):437-51. PubMed ID: 25658007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of potential advantages of relevant ions for particle therapy: a model based study. Grün R; Friedrich T; Krämer M; Zink K; Durante M; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Scholz M Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):1037-47. PubMed ID: 25652516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimations of relative biological effectiveness of secondary fragments in carbon ion irradiation of water using CR-39 plastic detector and microdosimetric kinetic model. Hirano Y; Kodaira S; Souda H; Osaki K; Torikoshi M Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):781-789. PubMed ID: 31705815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]