389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26461181)
1. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
van Valkenhoef G; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 26461181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Node-Splitting Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Evaluation of Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.
Yu-Kang T
Value Health; 2016 Dec; 19(8):957-963. PubMed ID: 27987646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evidence-splitting approach to evaluation of direct-indirect evidence inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Shih MC; Tu YK
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 33543575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new approach to evaluating loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Turner RM; Band T; Morris TP; Fisher DJ; Higgins JPT; Carpenter JR; White IR
Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):4917-4930. PubMed ID: 37767752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
Shih MC; Tu YK
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
Spineli LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the consistency assumptions underlying network meta-regression using aggregate data.
Donegan S; Dias S; Welton NJ
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):207-224. PubMed ID: 30367548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated methods to test connectedness and quantify indirectness of evidence in network meta-analysis.
Thom H; White IR; Welton NJ; Lu G
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 30403829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostics for generalized linear hierarchical models in network meta-analysis.
Zhao H; Hodges JS; Carlin BP
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 28683516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The design-by-treatment interaction model: a unifying framework for modelling loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
Jackson D; Boddington P; White IR
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 26588593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of adaptive platform trials using a network approach.
Marschner IC; Schou IM
Clin Trials; 2022 Oct; 19(5):479-489. PubMed ID: 35993542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Jackson D; Barrett JK; Rice S; White IR; Higgins JP
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(21):3639-54. PubMed ID: 24777711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated drawing of network plots in network meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 26060934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying inconsistency in network meta-analysis: Is the net heat plot a reliable method?
Freeman SC; Fisher D; White IR; Auperin A; Carpenter JR
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(29):5547-5564. PubMed ID: 31647136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
