95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26461926)
1. How Accurate Is the Dating of Scheduled 39-Week Deliveries?
Guseh SH; Little SE; Zera CA; Robinson JN
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Mar; 33(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 26461926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Non-Medically Indicated Scheduled Deliveries.
Kacica MA; Glantz JC; Xiong K; Shields EP; Cherouny PH
Matern Child Health J; 2017 Apr; 21(4):932-941. PubMed ID: 27987105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in the indications for scheduled births to reduce nonmedically indicated deliveries occurring before 39 weeks of gestation.
Bailit JL; Iams J; Silber A; Krew M; McKenna D; Marcotte M; Donovan E;
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 22825080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mortality and morbidity in early preterm breech singletons: impact of a policy of planned vaginal delivery.
Kayem G; Combaud V; Lorthe E; Haddad B; Descamps P; Marpeau L; Goffinet F; Sentilhes L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():61-5. PubMed ID: 26164568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Errors in estimated gestational ages reduce the likelihood of health facility deliveries: results from an observational cohort study in Zanzibar.
Fulcher I; Hedt K; Marealle S; Tibaijuka J; Abdalla O; Hofmann R; Layer E; Mitchell M; Hedt-Gauthier B
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jan; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 31959165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
Laye MR; Dellinger EH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [C-section rate in low-risk women: a useful indicator to compare hospitals attending deliveries with different risks].
Librero J; Peiró S; Belda A; Calabuig J
Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 25028300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early elective deliveries accounted for nearly 9 percent of births paid for by Medicaid.
Fowler TT; Schiff J; Applegate MS; Griffith K; Fairbrother GL
Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Dec; 33(12):2170-8. PubMed ID: 25489035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the rate of elective deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation: methodology matters.
Tomlinson MW; Durham L
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 120(1):173-6. PubMed ID: 22914407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antepartum management protocol. Timing and mode of delivery in gestational diabetes.
Hod M; Bar J; Peled Y; Fried S; Katz I; Itzhak M; Ashkenazi S; Schindel B; Ben-Rafael Z
Diabetes Care; 1998 Aug; 21 Suppl 2():B113-7. PubMed ID: 9704237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the 10-Group Classification System to analyze how the population control policy change in China has affected cesarean delivery.
Zhang Y; Gu N; Wang Z; Zheng M; Hu Y; Dai Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 138(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 28502115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mode of delivery and level of neonatal care in Lombardy: a descriptive analysis according to volume of care.
Parazzini F; Cipriani S; Bulfoni G; Bulfoni C; Bellù R; Zanini R; Mosca F
Ital J Pediatr; 2015 Mar; 41():24. PubMed ID: 25888471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database.
Black C; Kaye JA; Jick H
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 15994631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Timing and consequences of early term and late term deliveries.
Parikh L; Singh J; Timofeev J; Zahn CM; Istwan NB; Rhea DJ; Driggers RW
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jul; 27(11):1158-62. PubMed ID: 24134662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does cesarean section before the scheduled date increase the risk of neonatal morbidity?
Riskin A; Gonen R; Kugelman A; Maroun E; Ekhilevitch G
Isr Med Assoc J; 2014 Sep; 16(9):559-63. PubMed ID: 25351013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
