These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26462354)
21. [Quantitative analysis of craniofacial skeleton asymmetry by three-dimensional computed tomography]. Wang RC; Li GZ; Liu CM; Jia CY; Gao QW; Han Y Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 29(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 24624882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach to Correct Facial Asymmetry: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Analysis. Choi JW; Park H; Kim B S IH; Kim N; Kwon SM; Lee JY Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):496e-499e. PubMed ID: 35196690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Marchetti C; Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Sarti A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21030211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between pterygomaxillary fissure morphology and maxillary/mandibular position : A cone beam computed tomography assessment. Icen M; Orhan K; Oz U; Horasan S; Avsever H J Orofac Orthop; 2020 May; 81(3):183-191. PubMed ID: 32125437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery. Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software. Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Postsurgical volumetric airway changes in 2-jaw orthognathic surgery patients. Hart PS; McIntyre BP; Kadioglu O; Currier GF; Sullivan SM; Li J; Shay C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):536-46. PubMed ID: 25919099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography. Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation and correction of facial asymmetry in the coronal plane. Susarla SM; Peacock ZS; Kaban LB J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1299-301. PubMed ID: 25006912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Feasibility of integrating 3D photos and cone-beam computed tomography images used to evaluate changes of soft and hard tissue after orthognathic surgery]. Wang Z; Zhu LN; Zhou L; Yi B Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Jun; 48(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 27318922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery. Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 3-dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: is it accurate? Schendel SA; Jacobson R; Khalessi S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(8):1406-14. PubMed ID: 23642546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional analyses of facial soft tissue configuration of Japanese females with jaw deformity--a trial of polygonal view of facial soft tissue deformity in orthognathic patients. Shimomatsu K; Nozoe E; Ishihata K; Okawachi T; Nakamura N J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):559-67. PubMed ID: 22078498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji Y; Muramatsu A; Yoshida K; Goto S; Kurita K; Ariji E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 16920547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A three-dimensional analysis of skeletal and dental characteristics in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry. Yu J; Hu Y; Huang M; Chen J; Ding X; Zheng L J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):449-462. PubMed ID: 29562577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis. Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reliability and validity of MicroScribe-3DXL system in comparison with radiographic cephalometric system: Angular measurements. Barmou MM; Hussain SF; Abu Hassan MI Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):314-327. PubMed ID: 29673688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]