These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26463475)

  • 1. IONM evidence: Putting the work and insight of Téllez et al. in context.
    Skinner SA; Holdefer RN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1015-1017. PubMed ID: 26463475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological mechanism of possibly confounding peripheral activation of the facial nerve during corticobulbar tract monitoring.
    Téllez MJ; Ulkatan S; Urriza J; Arranz-Arranz B; Deletis V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1710-1716. PubMed ID: 26564391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pyramidal activation of the facial nucleus in the cat.
    Tanaka T
    Brain Res; 1976 Feb; 103(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 1252929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Neuronal analysis of the projection of the caudal trigeminal nucleus to the nucleus of the facial nerve in cats].
    Kasabian SA; Fanardzhian VV
    Neirofiziologiia; 1981; 13(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 6269008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Synaptic mechanisms of descending influences on the facial nucleus motor neurons in the cat].
    Fanardzhian VV; Kasabian SA; Manvelian LR
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 Jul; 67(7):1007-13. PubMed ID: 7286315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dissanayaka T; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1968-1990. PubMed ID: 28699187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve--identification of the actual excitation site in the cat].
    Gotoh K; Ohira T; Namiki J; Ajimi Y; Ishikawa M; Shiobara R; Toya S; Takase M
    No To Shinkei; 1993 Jul; 45(7):655-60. PubMed ID: 8398386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateralized asymmetry of facial motor evoked potentials.
    Triggs WJ; Ghacibeh G; Springer U; Bowers D
    Neurology; 2005 Aug; 65(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 16116113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
    Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to measure the distribution of latencies of motor evoked potentials in man.
    Firmin L; Müller S; Rösler KM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):176-82. PubMed ID: 20630798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Within-session repeated a-tDCS: the effects of repetition rate and inter-stimulus interval on corticospinal excitability and motor performance.
    Bastani A; Jaberzadeh S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Sep; 125(9):1809-18. PubMed ID: 24582469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncrossed cortico-muscular projections in humans are abundant to facial muscles of the upper and lower face, but may differ between sexes.
    Fischer U; Hess CW; Rösler KM
    J Neurol; 2005 Jan; 252(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 15654551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
    Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic transcranial and electric direct stimulation of the facial motor cortex in dogs.
    Estrem S; Haghighi S; Davis WE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Sep; 103(3):439-42. PubMed ID: 2122375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked electromyogram as a function of facial nerve.
    Roopakala MS; Singh H; Kanaka R; Sharma R; Ravindra S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 47(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 15255628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve: where is the actual excitation site?
    Rösler KM; Schmid UD; Hess CW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 43():362-8. PubMed ID: 1773775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathophysiological basis of contralateral reinnervation in facial palsy.
    Zwarts MJ; Gilhuis HJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Oct; 46(4):611-2. PubMed ID: 22987709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
    Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.