167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26463565)
1. CORR Insights(®): do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?
Hallab NJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3915-7. PubMed ID: 26463565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?
Catelas I; Lehoux EA; Hurda I; Baskey SJ; Gala L; Foster R; Kim PR; Beaulé PE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3903-14. PubMed ID: 26324830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CORR Insights(®): No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.
Collier JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):456-8. PubMed ID: 26290340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CORR Insights(®): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.
Argenson JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 26349441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The absence of a metal-on-metal bearing does not preclude the formation of a destructive pseudotumor in the hip--a case report.
Bisseling P; Tan T; Lu Z; Campbell PA; Susante JL
Acta Orthop; 2013 Aug; 84(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 23848217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
Leopold SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):300-303. PubMed ID: 27844400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CORR Insights(®): There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
Porcher R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2042-4. PubMed ID: 25613407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral total hip replacement: periprosthetic pseudotumor collections are more prevalent in metal-on-metal implants compared to non-metal-on-metal ones.
Slonimsky E; Kushnir T; Kadar A; Menahem A; Grundshtein A; Dekel S; Eshed I
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25940064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pseudotumor formation and serum ions after large head metal-on-metal stemmed total hip replacement. Risk factors, time course and revisions in 706 hips.
Bosker BH; Ettema HB; van Rossum M; Boomsma MF; Kollen BJ; Maas M; Verheyen CC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Mar; 135(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 25663048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CORR Insights®: No Difference in Revision Rates and High Survival Rates in Large-head Metal-on-metal THA Versus Metal-on-polyethylene THA: Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Meding JB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jul; 482(7):1183-1184. PubMed ID: 38165265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a titanium sleeve reduce the frequency of pseudotumors in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 5-7years follow-up?
Hjorth MH; Egund N; Mechlenburg I; Gelineck J; Jakobsen SS; Soballe K; Stilling M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 28341265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CORR Insights(®): What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
Nich C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3465-7. PubMed ID: 25791447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
Amstutz H; Le Duff M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3981-2. PubMed ID: 26354177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Kwon YM; Thomas P; Summer B; Pandit H; Taylor A; Beard D; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Orthop Res; 2010 Apr; 28(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 19834954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
Haughom BD; Erickson BJ; Hellman MD; Jacobs JJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3983-4. PubMed ID: 26400250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study.
Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound findings in asymptomatic patients with modular metal on metal total hip arthroplasty.
Frisch NB; Wessell NM; Taliaferro K; Van Holsbeeck M; Silverton CD
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 May; 46(5):641-649. PubMed ID: 28204856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CORR Insights®: what are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?
Mabry T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):485-6. PubMed ID: 25160944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The correlation of wear with histological features after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; Kamali A; Maggiani F; Glyn-Jones S; Gill HS; Murray DW; Athanasou N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(12):e81. PubMed ID: 23783212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.
Nam D; Barrack T; Johnson SR; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2115-22. PubMed ID: 26911973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
