These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26463568)

  • 21. Unacceptable practice in our field.
    Haddad FS
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Nov; 102-B(11):1429-1430. PubMed ID: 33135453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The importance of being earnest in post-publication review: scientific fraud and the scourges of anonymity and excuses.
    Stebbing J; Sanders DA
    Oncogene; 2018 Feb; 37(6):695-696. PubMed ID: 29035386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
    Sohail S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
    Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
    Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research?
    Suhrbier A; Poland GA
    Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31(51):6041-2. PubMed ID: 24184289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Authorship and co-authorship].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Irreproducible results in preclinical cardiovascular research: opportunities in times of need.
    Sipido KR
    Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Mar; 115(3):e34-e36. PubMed ID: 30789233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preface: Scientific Premise and Rigors in Scientific Research, Peer Review, Editing and Publishing.
    Zhang R
    Curr Cancer Drug Targets; 2017; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28067174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Financial disclosure of reviewers.
    Parameswaran K
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Oct; 168(8):1010; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 14555459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Editorial: How Does CORR
    Dobbs MB; Gebhardt MC; Gioe TJ; Manner PA; Porcher R; Rimnac CM; Wongworawat MD; Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Sep; 475(9):2143-2145. PubMed ID: 28664262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fallout from hailed cloning paper.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2013 May; 497(7451):543-4. PubMed ID: 23719438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Standardization of reviews of scientific publications].
    Ventura AG
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):574-5; author reply 575. PubMed ID: 19839127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Responsiveness in the review of scientific articles for publication].
    Ventura AG
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):573; author reply 573. PubMed ID: 19820805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Notice: Duplicate Publication.
    Ushiop M; Iwasaki S; Chihara Y; Murofushi T
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 28(3):244; author reply 244. PubMed ID: 18773546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.