These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26463568)
41. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned. Adam D; Knight J Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Why published research is untrustworthy. Lose G; Klarskov N Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1271-1274. PubMed ID: 28707207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology. Wong VS J Child Neurol; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 20606060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Can't Get No Reproduction: Leading Researchers Discuss the Problem of Irreproducible Results. Williams R Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):667-70. PubMed ID: 26405184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why". Moliterno DJ JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Keeping us all honest: publication ethics and AJA. Parkinson L Australas J Ageing; 2014 Jun; 33(2):71. PubMed ID: 24902484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges. Mullane K; Williams M Biochem Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 138():7-18. PubMed ID: 28396196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Ethics matter: to authors, editors and those we serve. Babor TF Addiction; 2003 Jan; 98(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12492748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A case of plagiarism: lessons for editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and plagiarists. Alspach JG Crit Care Nurse; 2014 Oct; 34(5):12-6. PubMed ID: 25274760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. New guidelines for authors. Westhoff C; Bowen T Contraception; 2013 Jul; 88(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23773526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Should journals police scientific fraud? Marris E Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. How do we ensure 'high quality' clinical research? Creinin MD; Shields W Contraception; 2005 Aug; 72(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 16022844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals. Eldredge J Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Editorial: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference-The Least We Can Do. Leopold SS; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):929-932. PubMed ID: 28124297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Use of impact factors. Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):173. PubMed ID: 11809301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]