These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26464167)

  • 1. Compression distance can discriminate animals by genetic profile, build relationship matrices and estimate breeding values.
    Hudson NJ; Porto-Neto L; Kijas JW; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():78. PubMed ID: 26464167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.
    Porto-Neto LR; Barendse W; Henshall JM; McWilliam SM; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():84. PubMed ID: 26525050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic evaluation using SNP- and haplotype-based genomic relationship matrices in a closed line of Duroc pigs.
    Uemoto Y; Sato S; Kikuchi T; Egawa S; Kohira K; Sakuma H; Miyashita S; Arata S; Kojima T; Suzuki K
    Anim Sci J; 2017 Oct; 88(10):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 28557153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of missing heritability for complex traits in Brown Swiss cattle.
    Román-Ponce SI; Samoré AB; Dolezal MA; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):36. PubMed ID: 24898214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data compression can discriminate broilers by selection line, detect haplotypes, and estimate genetic potential for complex phenotypes.
    Hudson NJ; Hawken RJ; Okimoto R; Sapp RL; Reverter A
    Poult Sci; 2017 Sep; 96(9):3031-3038. PubMed ID: 28633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein-Friesian cattle.
    Veerkamp RF; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Dec; 48(1):95. PubMed ID: 27905878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction of breeding values in the New Zealand sheep industry using a 50K SNP chip.
    Auvray B; McEwan JC; Newman SA; Lee M; Dodds KG
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4375-89. PubMed ID: 25149326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhy A; Esmailizadeh A; Fozi MA; Kranis A; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):16. PubMed ID: 28148241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic analysis of within-litter variation in piglets' birth weight using genomic or pedigree relationship matrices.
    Sell-Kubiak E; Wang S; Knol EF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1471-80. PubMed ID: 26020168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding.
    Meuwissen TH; Odegard J; Andersen-Ranberg I; Grindflek E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Aug; 46(1):49. PubMed ID: 25158793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heritability estimates from genomewide relatedness matrices in wild populations: Application to a passerine, using a small sample size.
    Perrier C; Delahaie B; Charmantier A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Jul; 18(4):838-853. PubMed ID: 29667373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of pedigree and various forms of marker-derived relationship coefficients in genomic prediction and their correlations.
    Solaymani S; Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A; Esmailizadeh A; Tusell L; Momen M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):423-437. PubMed ID: 32003127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.