These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26464167)

  • 21. Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):82. PubMed ID: 27799053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. RAD-sequencing for estimating genomic relatedness matrix-based heritability in the wild: A case study in roe deer.
    Gervais L; Perrier C; Bernard M; Merlet J; Pemberton JM; Pujol B; Quéméré E
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 31058463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use and optimization of different sources of information for genomic prediction.
    Ilska JJ; Meuwissen THE; Kranis A; Woolliams JA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):90. PubMed ID: 29228899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
    Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
    Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans.
    Xavier A; Muir WM; Rainey KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():55. PubMed ID: 26830693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimates of genetic variance and variance of predicted genetic merits using pedigree or genomic relationship matrices in six Brown Swiss cattle populations for different traits.
    Loberg A; Dürr JW; Fikse WF; Jorjani H; Crooks L
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):376-85. PubMed ID: 25727736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals.
    Vandenplas J; Calus MP; Sevillano CA; Windig JJ; Bastiaansen JW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):61. PubMed ID: 27549177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.
    Liu Z; Goddard ME; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5833-50. PubMed ID: 25022678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring genetic connectedness between herds based on high density SNP markers.
    Zhou ZW; Wang X; Ding XD
    Yi Chuan; 2021 Apr; 43(4):340-349. PubMed ID: 33972208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.