BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26464299)

  • 1. A systematic literature review on security and privacy of electronic health record systems: technical perspectives.
    Rezaeibagha F; Win KT; Susilo W
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(3):23-38. PubMed ID: 26464299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.
    Rezaeibagha F; Mu Y
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 May; 89():25-31. PubMed ID: 26980356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Key security and privacy issues from implementing the National Electronic Health Record in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Seiedfarajollah S; Safdari R; Ghazisaeedi M; Keikha L
    East Mediterr Health J; 2019 Oct; 25(9):656-659. PubMed ID: 31625591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review.
    Fernández-Alemán JL; Señor IC; Lozoya PÁ; Toval A
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Jun; 46(3):541-62. PubMed ID: 23305810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.
    Entzeridou E; Markopoulou E; Mollaki V
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Feb; 110():98-107. PubMed ID: 29331259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Security Techniques for the Electronic Health Records.
    Kruse CS; Smith B; Vanderlinden H; Nealand A
    J Med Syst; 2017 Aug; 41(8):127. PubMed ID: 28733949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.
    Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Lewis R; Majeed A; Bell D
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Oct; 15():86. PubMed ID: 26466787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meeting EHR security requirements: SeAAS approach.
    Katt B; Trojer T; Breu R; Schabetsberger T; Wozak F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():85-91. PubMed ID: 20543314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient Privacy-Preserving Access Control Scheme in Electronic Health Records System.
    Ming Y; Zhang T
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30340411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Access and privacy rights using web security standards to increase patient empowerment.
    Falcão-Reis F; Costa-Pereira A; Correia ME
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():275-85. PubMed ID: 18560089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concepts for a standard based cross-organisational information security management system in the context of a nationwide EHR.
    Mense A; Hoheiser-Pförtner F; Schmid M; Wahl H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():548-52. PubMed ID: 23920615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk assessment of integrated electronic health records.
    Bjornsson BT; Sigurdardottir G; Stefansson SO
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():78-84. PubMed ID: 20543313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PAX: Using Pseudonymization and Anonymization to Protect Patients' Identities and Data in the Healthcare System.
    Al-Zubaidie M; Zhang Z; Zhang J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 31035551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Security of electronic medical information and patient privacy: what you need to know.
    Andriole KP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt B):1212-6. PubMed ID: 25467897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Migrating to electronic health record systems: A comparative study between the United States and the United Kingdom.
    Wilson K; Khansa L
    Health Policy; 2018 Nov; 122(11):1232-1239. PubMed ID: 30193980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing Privacy Controls for Patients via a Selective Authentic Electronic Health Record Exchange Service: Qualitative Study of Perspectives by Medical Professionals and Patients.
    Alaqra AS; Fischer-Hübner S; Framner E
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e10954. PubMed ID: 30578189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The need for technical solutions for maintaining the privacy of EHR.
    Ray P; Wimalasiri J
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4686-9. PubMed ID: 17947109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures.
    Chhanabhai P; Holt A
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jan; 9(1):8. PubMed ID: 17435617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure.
    Campos-Castillo C; Anthony DL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e130-40. PubMed ID: 25059953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Security requirements in EHR systems and archives.
    Ruotsalainen P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 103():453-8. PubMed ID: 15747955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.