BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26464499)

  • 1. Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.
    Poole RL; Aleman TR; Ellis HT; Tordoff MG
    Chem Senses; 2016 Jan; 41(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 26464499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():286-90. PubMed ID: 27526998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influenza H3N2 infection of the collaborative cross founder strains reveals highly divergent host responses and identifies a unique phenotype in CAST/EiJ mice.
    Leist SR; Pilzner C; van den Brand JM; Dengler L; Geffers R; Kuiken T; Balling R; Kollmus H; Schughart K
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Feb; 17():143. PubMed ID: 26921172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 16530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():348-355. PubMed ID: 29933030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rat's acceptance and preference for sucrose, maltodextrin, and saccharin solutions and mixtures.
    Sclafani A; Thompson B; Smith JC
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Feb; 63(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 9523890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative affective potency of glycine, L-serine and sucrose as assessed by a brief-access taste test in inbred strains of mice.
    Dotson CD; Spector AC
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):489-98. PubMed ID: 15269121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single nucleotide polymorphism patterns associated with a cancer resistant phenotype.
    Dunnick JK; Pandiri AR; Shockley KR; Herbert R; Mav D; Phadke D; Shah RR; Merrick BA
    Exp Mol Pathol; 2022 Oct; 128():104812. PubMed ID: 35872013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diet-induced obesity in genetically diverse collaborative cross mouse founder strains reveals diverse phenotype response and amelioration by quercetin treatment in 129S1/SvImJ, PWK/EiJ, CAST/PhJ, and WSB/EiJ mice.
    Griffin LE; Essenmacher L; Racine KC; Iglesias-Carres L; Tessem JS; Smith SM; Neilson AP
    J Nutr Biochem; 2021 Jan; 87():108521. PubMed ID: 33039581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain gene expression differences related to ethanol preference in the collaborative cross founder strains.
    Anderson JQ; Darakjian P; Hitzemann R; Lockwood DR; Phillips TJ; Ozburn AR
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2022; 16():992727. PubMed ID: 36212197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic variability affects the skeletal response to immobilization in founder strains of the diversity outbred mouse population.
    Friedman MA; Abood A; Senwar B; Zhang Y; Maroni CR; Ferguson VL; Farber CR; Donahue HJ
    Bone Rep; 2021 Dec; 15():101140. PubMed ID: 34761080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
    Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive and comparative phenotypic analysis of the collaborative founder strains identifies new and known phenotypes.
    Kollmus H; Fuchs H; Lengger C; Haselimashhadi H; Bogue MA; Östereicher MA; Horsch M; Adler T; Aguilar-Pimentel JA; Amarie OV; Becker L; Beckers J; Calzada-Wack J; Garrett L; Hans W; Hölter SM; Klein-Rodewald T; Maier H; Mayer-Kuckuk P; Miller G; Moreth K; Neff F; Rathkolb B; Rácz I; Rozman J; Spielmann N; Treise I; Busch D; Graw J; Klopstock T; Wolf E; Wurst W; Yildirim AÖ; Mason J; Torres A; ; Balling R; Mehaan T; Gailus-Durner V; Schughart K; Hrabě de Angelis M
    Mamm Genome; 2020 Feb; 31(1-2):30-48. PubMed ID: 32060626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Islet proteomics reveals genetic variation in dopamine production resulting in altered insulin secretion.
    Mitok KA; Freiberger EC; Schueler KL; Rabaglia ME; Stapleton DS; Kwiecien NW; Malec PA; Hebert AS; Broman AT; Kennedy RT; Keller MP; Coon JJ; Attie AD
    J Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 293(16):5860-5877. PubMed ID: 29496998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the blood-brain barrier in genetically diverse laboratory mouse strains.
    Schaffenrath J; Huang SF; Wyss T; Delorenzi M; Keller A
    Fluids Barriers CNS; 2021 Jul; 18(1):34. PubMed ID: 34321020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic variance contributes to ingestive processes: a survey of eleven inbred mouse strains for fat (Intralipid) intake.
    Lewis SR; Dym C; Chai C; Singh A; Kest B; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan; 90(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17028044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calcium taste preferences: genetic analysis and genome screen of C57BL/6J x PWK/PhJ hybrid mice.
    Tordoff MG; Reed DR; Shao H
    Genes Brain Behav; 2008 Aug; 7(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18363849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic mapping in Diversity Outbred mice identifies a Trpa1 variant influencing late-phase formalin response.
    Recla JM; Bubier JA; Gatti DM; Ryan JL; Long KH; Robledo RF; Glidden NC; Hou G; Churchill GA; Maser RS; Zhang ZW; Young EE; Chesler EJ; Bult CJ
    Pain; 2019 Aug; 160(8):1740-1753. PubMed ID: 31335644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.