These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26464535)

  • 1. A Confocal Microscopic Evaluation of the Dehydration Effect on Conventional, Resin Reinforced Powder/Liquid and Paste to Paste Glass Ionomer Luting Cements.
    George L; Kandaswamy D
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Aug; 7(8):28-32. PubMed ID: 26464535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of mechanical and adhesion properties of glass ionomer cement incorporating nano-sized hydroxyapatite particles.
    Kheur M; Kantharia N; Lakha T; Kheur S; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    Odontology; 2020 Jan; 108(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 31028514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison and evaluation of the effect of polymerization of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and dual-cure resin cement on the crystalline structure of dentin using synchrotron X-ray diffraction and its clinical correlation with postoperative sensitivity.
    Balaji A; Jei JB; Muthukumar B
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(2):119-126. PubMed ID: 37102536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF
    J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1495-501. PubMed ID: 9240386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns.
    Mitchell CA; Abbariki M; Orr JF
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 10762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement.
    de Araújo DF; Chaves LP; Bim O; Pimentel Garcia FC; Ishikiriama SK; Honório HM; Wang L
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 24613604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post cementation sensitivity evaluation of glass Ionomer, zinc phosphate and resin modified glass Ionomer luting cements under class II inlays: An in vivo comparative study.
    Chandrasekhar V
    J Conserv Dent; 2010 Jan; 13(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 20582215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
    Patil SM; Kamble VB; Desai RG; Arabbi KC; Prakash V
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC84-7. PubMed ID: 26436055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.
    Mitchell CA; Douglas WH; Cheng YS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10483390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cement.
    Karkera R; Raj AP; Isaac L; Mustafa M; Reddy RN; Thomas M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 27965490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new 2-paste glass ionomer cement.
    Komori A; Kojima I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jun; 123(6):649-52. PubMed ID: 12806344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Lee JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10668033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro.
    Robertello FJ; Coffey JP; Lynde TA; King P
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 10424980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.