These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26464598)

  • 1. Evaluation of a Mathematical Model for Digital Image Enhancement.
    Geha H; Nasseh I; Noujeim M
    Open Dent J; 2015; 9():292-6. PubMed ID: 26464598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
    Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mathematical model relating changes of grey values to changes of thicknesses of a stepwedge.
    Geha H; Bechara B; Faddoul T; Noujeim M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):50719185. PubMed ID: 22842639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2.
    Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Neider MW; Thayer DW; Wabers HD; White JK; Pugliese AJ; Pugliese MF;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3269-82. PubMed ID: 18421079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image Enhancement via Subimage Histogram Equalization Based on Mean and Variance.
    Zhuang L; Guan Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2017; 2017():6029892. PubMed ID: 29403529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A psychophysical comparison of two methods for adaptive histogram equalization.
    Zimmerman JB; Cousins SB; Hartzell KM; Frisse ME; Kahn MG
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 May; 2(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2488161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
    Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K; Rumack PM; Schick DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9446976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
    Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel technique for analysing histogram equalized medical images using superpixels.
    Yao L; Muhammad S
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2019 Oct; 24(sup1):53-61. PubMed ID: 30689446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Imaging Enhancement Tools in the Detection of Horizontal Root Fractures.
    Barayan M; Nasseh I; Geha H; Noujeim M
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Aug; 11(8):ZC98-ZC101. PubMed ID: 28969284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of 'local contrast enhancement' for oral fluorescein angiograms.
    Newsom RS; Sinthanayothin C; Boyce J; Casswell AG; Williamson TH
    Eye (Lond); 2000 Jun; 14 ( Pt 3A)():318-23. PubMed ID: 11026992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast Enhancement Algorithm Based on Gap Adjustment for Histogram Equalization.
    Chiu CC; Ting CC
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jun; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 27338412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.