These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26465047)

  • 1. Optimal dynamic control of invasions: applying a systematic conservation approach.
    Adams VM; Setterfield SA
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Jun; 25(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 26465047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cost of not acting: Delaying invasive grass management increases costs and threatens assets in a national park, northern Australia.
    Rossiter-Rachor NA; Adams VM; Canham CA; Dixon DJ; Cameron TN; Setterfield SA
    J Environ Manage; 2023 May; 333():116785. PubMed ID: 36758396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The behavior of multiple independent managers and ecological traits interact to determine prevalence of weeds.
    Coutts SR; Yokomizo H; Buckley YM
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Apr; 23(3):523-36. PubMed ID: 23734483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial prioritization for widespread invasive species control: Trade-offs between current impact and future spread.
    Carter S; Mills C; Hao Z; Mott R; Hauser CE; White M; Sharples J; Taylor J; Moore JL
    Ecol Appl; 2024 Jul; 34(5):e2982. PubMed ID: 38831569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decision framework for prioritizing multiple management actions for threatened marine megafauna.
    Fuentes MM; Blackwood J; Jones B; Kim M; Leis B; Limpus CJ; Marsh H; Mitchell J; Pouzols FM; Pressey RL; Visconti P
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Jan; 25(1):200-14. PubMed ID: 26255368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using economic instruments to develop effective management of invasive species: insights from a bioeconomic model.
    McDermott SM; Irwin RE; Taylor BW
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1086-100. PubMed ID: 23967577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Optimal Land-Use Scenarios to Assess Trade-Offs between Conservation, Development, and Social Values.
    Adams VM; Pressey RL; Álvarez-Romero JG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158350. PubMed ID: 27362347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adding fuel to the fire: the impacts of non-native grass invasion on fire management at a regional scale.
    Setterfield SA; Rossiter-Rachor NA; Douglas MM; Wainger L; Petty AM; Barrow P; Shepherd IJ; Ferdinands KB
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e59144. PubMed ID: 23690917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal spatial prioritization of control resources for elimination of invasive species under demographic uncertainty.
    Pepin KM; Smyser TJ; Davis AJ; Miller RS; McKee S; VerCauteren KC; Kendall W; Slootmaker C
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Sep; 30(6):e02126. PubMed ID: 32167631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating fisheries conservation strategies in the socio-ecological system: A grid-based dynamic model to link spatial conservation prioritization tools with tactical fisheries management.
    Li Y; Sun M; Zhang C; Zhang Y; Xu B; Ren Y; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230946. PubMed ID: 32243469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A framework for allocating conservation resources among multiple threats and actions.
    Moore JL; Camaclang AE; Moore AL; Hauser CE; Runge MC; Picheny V; Rumpff L
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1639-1649. PubMed ID: 33909929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing Urban Plant Invasions: a Multi-Criteria Prioritization Approach.
    Potgieter LJ; Gaertner M; Irlich UM; O'Farrell PJ; Stafford L; Vogt H; Richardson DM
    Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 62(6):1168-1185. PubMed ID: 30084019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reallocating budgets among ongoing and emerging conservation projects.
    Wu CH; Dodd AJ; Hauser CE; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):955-966. PubMed ID: 32648317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of using feasibility models in systematic conservation planning to predict landholder management uptake.
    Tulloch AI; Tulloch VJ; Evans MC; Mills M
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1462-73. PubMed ID: 25382827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal allocation of conservation effort among subpopulations of a threatened species: how important is patch quality?
    Chauvenet AL; Baxter PW; McDonald-Madden E; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Apr; 20(3):789-97. PubMed ID: 20437964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subpopulation triage: how to allocate conservation effort among populations.
    McDonald-Madden E; Baxter PW; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 18477029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invasive Andropogon gayanus (Gamba grass) alters litter decomposition and nitrogen fluxes in an Australian tropical savanna.
    Rossiter-Rachor NA; Setterfield SA; Hutley LB; McMaster D; Schmidt S; Douglas MM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11705. PubMed ID: 28916828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimizing invader impacts: striking the right balance between removal and restoration.
    Hall RJ; Hastings A
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Dec; 249(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 17920635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reserve selection with land market feedbacks.
    Butsic V; Lewis DJ; Radeloff VC
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():276-84. PubMed ID: 23141878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A safety rule approach to surveillance and eradication of biological invasions.
    Yemshanov D; Haight RG; Koch FH; Venette R; Studens K; Fournier RE; Swystun T; Turgeon JJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181482. PubMed ID: 28759584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.