97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26466105)
1. Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraoperatively Confirmed Pelvic Adhesions.
Macer ML; Mathur M; Spektor M; Gysler S; Staib L; Kodaman P; McCarthy S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 26466105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior cul-de-sac obliteration associated with endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation.
Kataoka ML; Togashi K; Yamaoka T; Koyama T; Ueda H; Kobayashi H; Rahman M; Higuchi T; Fujii S
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 15665220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of pelvic MRI in the diagnosis of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration in cases of deep pelvic endometriosis.
Macario S; Chassang M; Novellas S; Baudin G; Delotte J; Toullalan O; Chevallier P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1410-5. PubMed ID: 23169738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis.
Gousse AE; Barbaric ZL; Safir MH; Madjar S; Marumoto AK; Raz S
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1606-13. PubMed ID: 11025716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absence of tumor invasion into pelvic structures in locally recurrent rectal cancer: prediction with preoperative MR imaging.
Dresen RC; Kusters M; Daniels-Gooszen AW; Cappendijk VC; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Kessels AG; de Bruïne AP; Beets GL; Rutten HJ; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 20574091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond laparoscopy: 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration.
Manganaro L; Vittori G; Vinci V; Fierro F; Tomei A; Lodise P; Sollazzo P; Sergi ME; Bernardo S; Ballesio L; Marini M; Porpora MG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 30(10):1432-8. PubMed ID: 22835943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrent or residual pelvic bowel cancer: accuracy of MRI local extent before salvage surgery.
Robinson P; Carrington BM; Swindell R; Shanks JH; O'dwyer ST
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jun; 57(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 12069470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.
Koplay M; Dogan NU; Erdogan H; Sivri M; Erol C; Nayman A; Karabagli P; Paksoy Y; Celik C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 58(5):538-46; quiz 648. PubMed ID: 25046775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of pelvic adhesions using multiphase and multislice MR imaging with kinematic display.
Katayama M; Masui T; Kobayashi S; Ito T; Sakahara H; Nozaki A; Kabasawa H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 11418407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical impact of gynecologic MRI.
Ratner ES; Staib LH; Cross SN; Raji R; Schwartz PE; McCarthy SM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):674-80. PubMed ID: 25714302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benign and malignant gynecologic disease: clinical importance of fluid and peritoneal enhancement in the pelvis at MR imaging.
Outwater EK; Siegelman ES; Wilson KM; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 8685345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for patients with extensive pelvic adhesions: a strategy to minimise conversion to laparotomy.
Hsu WC; Chang WC; Huang SC; Sheu BC; Torng PL; Chang DY
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 17550492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.
Bazot M; Darai E; Hourani R; Thomassin I; Cortez A; Uzan S; Buy JN
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 15205479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy and value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in planning exenterative pelvic surgery for advanced colorectal cancer.
Georgiou PA; Tekkis PP; Constantinides VA; Patel U; Goldin RD; Darzi AW; John Nicholls R; Brown G
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 49(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 23036847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Location-dependent value of pelvic MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis.
Krüger K; Behrendt K; Niedobitek-Kreuter G; Koltermann K; Ebert AD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 23478073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The usefulness of computed tomographic colonography for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Jeong SY; Chung DJ; Myung Yeo D; Lim YT; Hahn ST; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(5):809-14. PubMed ID: 24045261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of the female pelvis: current perspectives and review of genital tract congenital anomalies, and benign and malignant diseases.
Patel VH; Somers S
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Oct; 38(5):417-99. PubMed ID: 9391749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The value of laparoscopy in diagnosis and therapy in patients with chronic pelvic pain].
Bojahr B; Römer T; Lober R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 7645358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Traumatic cervical discoligamentous injuries: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings.
Malham GM; Ackland HM; Varma DK; Williamson OD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2754-9. PubMed ID: 19940733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain.
Kresch AJ; Seifer DB; Sachs LB; Barrese I
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):672-4. PubMed ID: 6238250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
