These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

936 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26466899)

  • 1. The contemporary role of Impella in a comprehensive mechanical circulatory support program: a single institutional experience.
    Pieri M; Contri R; Winterton D; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; De Bonis M; Pappalardo F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2015 Oct; 15():126. PubMed ID: 26466899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
    Seyfarth M; Sibbing D; Bauer I; Fröhlich G; Bott-Flügel L; Byrne R; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Schömig A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical efficacy of direct or indirect left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary cardiogenic shock.
    Char S; Fried J; Melehy A; Mehta S; Ning Y; Kurlansky P; Takeda K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 165(2):699-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34243933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
    Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impella 5.0 Support in INTERMACS II Cardiogenic Shock Patients Using Right and Left Axillary Artery Access.
    Schibilsky D; Lausberg H; Haller C; Lenglinger M; Woernle B; Haeberle H; Rosenberger P; Walker T; Schlensak C
    Artif Organs; 2015 Aug; 39(8):660-3. PubMed ID: 26147682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concomitant implantation of Impella
    Pappalardo F; Schulte C; Pieri M; Schrage B; Contri R; Soeffker G; Greco T; Lembo R; Müllerleile K; Colombo A; Sydow K; De Bonis M; Wagner F; Reichenspurner H; Blankenberg S; Zangrillo A; Westermann D
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Mar; 19(3):404-412. PubMed ID: 27709750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
    Werdan K; Gielen S; Ebelt H; Hochman JS
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Jan; 35(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 24014384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impella 5.0 as a Second-Line Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategy After Extracorporeal Life Support.
    Schibilsky D; Kruger T; Lausberg HF; Eisenlohr C; Haller C; Nemeth A; Schibilsky B; Haeberle H; Rosenberger P; Walker T; Schlensak C
    Artif Organs; 2016 Sep; 40(9):909-16. PubMed ID: 27645397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5.
    Manzo-Silberman S; Fichet J; Mathonnet A; Varenne O; Ricome S; Chaib A; Zuber B; Spaulding C; Cariou A
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 23069592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the Impella 2.5 system alone, after and in combination with an intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock: case description and review of the literature.
    Cubeddu RJ; Lago R; Horvath SA; Vignola PA; O'Neill W; Palacios IF
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Apr; 7(12):1453-60. PubMed ID: 22522555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella Versus IABP in Patients With VA-ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Gandhi KD; Moras EC; Niroula S; Lopez PD; Aggarwal D; Bhatia K; Balboul Y; Daibes J; Correa A; Dominguez AC; Birati EY; Baran DA; Serrao G; Mahmood K; Vallabhajosyula S; Fox A
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 208():53-59. PubMed ID: 37812867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a three-center experience.
    Engström AE; Granfeldt H; Seybold-Epting W; Dahm M; Cocchieri R; Driessen AH; Sjauw KD; Vis MM; Baan J; Koch KT; De Jong M; Lagrand WK; Van Der Sloot JA; Tijssen JG; De Winter RJ; De Mol BA; Piek JJ; Henriques JP
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2013 Oct; 61(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 24096248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.