These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26467571)

  • 1. Designing for privacy management in hospitals: Understanding the gap between user activities and IT staff's understandings.
    Eikey EV; Murphy AR; Reddy MC; Xu H
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Dec; 84(12):1065-75. PubMed ID: 26467571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation.
    Jensen LG; Bossen C
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():44-53. PubMed ID: 26806711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' Opinions on Display Methods to Protect Privacy.
    Niimi Y; Ota K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():967-8. PubMed ID: 27332435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes.
    Yu P; Zhang Y; Gong Y; Zhang J
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):772-88. PubMed ID: 23770027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health Professionals' eHealth Literacy and System Experience Before and 3 Months After the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System: Longitudinal Study.
    Kayser L; Karnoe A; Duminski E; Jakobsen S; Terp R; Dansholm S; Roeder M; From G
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Apr; 9(2):e29780. PubMed ID: 35486414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients.
    Wang JY; Ho HY; Chen JD; Chai S; Tai CJ; Chen YF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Jul; 15():264. PubMed ID: 26162748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.
    McGinn CA; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Légaré F; Gagnon MP
    BMC Med; 2011 Apr; 9():46. PubMed ID: 21524315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancing Privacy Controls for Patients via a Selective Authentic Electronic Health Record Exchange Service: Qualitative Study of Perspectives by Medical Professionals and Patients.
    Alaqra AS; Fischer-Hübner S; Framner E
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e10954. PubMed ID: 30578189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses' Experiences of an Initial and Re-Implemented Electronic Health Record Use.
    Lee TT; Chang CP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():802-3. PubMed ID: 27332349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Private Hospital Workflow Optimization via Secure k-Means Clustering.
    Spini G; van Heesch M; Veugen T; Chatterjea S
    J Med Syst; 2019 Nov; 44(1):8. PubMed ID: 31784842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. End-user expectations during an electronic health record implementation: a case study in two academic hospitals.
    Joukes E; Cornet R; Abu-Hanna A; de Bruijne M; de Keizer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():501-5. PubMed ID: 25991198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation.
    Doyle RJ; Wang N; Anthony D; Borkan J; Shield RR; Goldman RE
    Fam Pract; 2012 Oct; 29(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 22379185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic health systems: challenges faced by hospital-based providers.
    Agno CF; Guo KL
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2013; 32(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 23903942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitude Towards Health Information Privacy and Electronic Health Records Among Urban Sri Lankan Adults.
    Tissera SR; Silva SN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():1003-4. PubMed ID: 27332453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems Faced by Nurses in Use of Electronic Health Records During Clinical Practice.
    Verma M; Gupta S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():985-6. PubMed ID: 27332444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The design and implementation of a ubiquitous personal health record system for South Africa.
    Kyazze M; Wesson J; Naude K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 206():29-41. PubMed ID: 25365669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Display methods of electronic patient record screens: patient privacy concerns.
    Niimi Y; Ota K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1029. PubMed ID: 23920803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mixed methods study of how clinician 'super users' influence others during the implementation of electronic health records.
    Yuan CT; Bradley EH; Nembhard IM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25889076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.