These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26468063)

  • 1. Effects of a novel magnetic orthopedic appliance (MOA-III) on the dentofacial complex in mild to moderate skeletal class III children.
    Zhao N; Feng J; Hu Z; Chen R; Shen G
    Head Face Med; 2015 Oct; 11():34. PubMed ID: 26468063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A novel magnetic orthopedic appliance in treatment of preadolescent mild skeletal Class Ⅲ patients].
    Zhao N; Feng J; Hu Z; Chen RJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Apr; 27(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 30146651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Changes of hard tissues in patients with functional and skeletal Angel Class Ⅲ malocclusion after FRⅢ appliance treatment].
    Zhang N; Wang S; Zheng W; Chen M; Shen YF; Yan HJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Dec; 25(6):725-728. PubMed ID: 28275799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Class III correction using an inter-arch spring-loaded module.
    Vanlaecken R; Williams MO; Razmus T; Gunel E; Martin C; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):32. PubMed ID: 24934153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion.
    Celikoglu M; Oktay H
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 23460730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillofacial growth changes after maxillary protraction therapy in children with class III malocclusion: a dual control group retrospective study.
    Xu S; Liu Y; Hou Y; Li Y; Ge X; Wang L; Zhao L; Ma W
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 38172784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.
    Baek SH; Ahn HW; Kwon YH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 20186090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel method for treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients.
    Al-Mozany SA; Dalci O; Almuzian M; Gonzalez C; Tarraf NE; Ali Darendeliler M
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):40. PubMed ID: 29226300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.