156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26468672)
1. [The Evaluation of Voice Quality via Signal Typing in Voice using Narrowband Spectrograms].
Barsties B; Hoffmann U; Maryn Y
Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 26468672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of hoarseness].
Hanschmann H; Berger R
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Feb; 90(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 21298598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity.
Barsties B; Maryn Y
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jul; 125(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 26951063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.
Haderlein T; Schwemmle C; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Ptok M; Nöth E
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():316325. PubMed ID: 26136813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Internal Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 und Acoustic Breathiness Index].
Latoszek BBV; Lehnert B
Laryngorhinootologie; 2018 Sep; 97(9):630-635. PubMed ID: 29635679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language.
Delgado Hernández J; León Gómez NM; Jiménez A; Izquierdo LM; Barsties V Latoszek B
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 May; 127(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 29490478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship Between Acoustic Signal Typing and Perceptual Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality for Sustained Vowels.
Clapham RP; van As-Brooks CJ; van Son RJ; Hilgers FJ; van den Brekel MW
J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):517.e23-9. PubMed ID: 25795366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of the Speech Task Characteristics on Perceptual Judgment of Mild to Moderate Dysphonia: A Methodological Study.
Lechien JR; Morsomme D; Finck C; Huet K; Delvaux V; Piccaluga M; Harmegnies B; Saussez S
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(3-4):156-164. PubMed ID: 30157482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sustained vowels and continuous speech in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia severity.
Maryn Y; Roy N
J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22832675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
