BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26469708)

  • 1. Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.
    Yasar TK; Wagner M; Bane O; Besa C; Babb JS; Kannengiesser S; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1064-72. PubMed ID: 26469708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
    Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography with gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance elastography and their correlation with transient elastography.
    Yoon JW; Lee ES; Park HJ; Park SB; Cho YY; Kannengiesser S; Hur J
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Jul; 28(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 35950274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements.
    Zhan C; Kannengiesser S; Chandarana H; Fenchel M; Ream J; Shanbhogue KP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1825-1833. PubMed ID: 30796479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal range for MR elastography measured liver stiffness in children without liver disease.
    Sawh MC; Newton KP; Goyal NP; Angeles JE; Harlow K; Bross C; Schlein AN; Hooker JC; Sy EZ; Glaser KJ; Yin M; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB; Schwimmer JB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar; 51(3):919-927. PubMed ID: 31452280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR elastography outperforms shear wave elastography for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension.
    Kennedy P; Stocker D; Carbonell G; Said D; Bane O; Hectors S; Abboud G; Cuevas J; Bolster BD; Friedman SL; Lewis S; Schiano T; Bhattacharya D; Fischman A; Thung S; Taouli B
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8339-8349. PubMed ID: 35727321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous measurement of hepatic and splenic stiffness using MR elastography: preliminary experience.
    Dyvorne HA; Jajamovich GH; Besa C; Cooper N; Taouli B
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Apr; 40(4):803-9. PubMed ID: 25294006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Park SJ; Lee KB; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():46-53. PubMed ID: 30292272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive prediction of portal pressure with MR elastography and DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen: Preliminary results.
    Wagner M; Hectors S; Bane O; Gordic S; Kennedy P; Besa C; Schiano TD; Thung S; Fischman A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 48(4):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.
    Morin CE; Dillman JR; Serai SD; Trout AT; Tkach JA; Wang H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W279-W287. PubMed ID: 30300003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: influence of intravenous gadolinium administration on measured liver stiffness.
    Hallinan JT; Alsaif HS; Wee A; Venkatesh SK
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Apr; 40(4):783-8. PubMed ID: 25331568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-Term Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography at 3.0T: Effects of Motion-Encoding Gradient Direction, Slice Position, and Meal Ingestion.
    Zhang J; Arena C; Pednekar A; Lambert B; Dees D; Lee VV; Muthupillai R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 26331461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liver and Spleen Stiffness Measurements by Point Shear Wave Elastography via Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse: Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability and Predictors of Variability in a US Population.
    Balakrishnan M; Souza F; Muñoz C; Augustin S; Loo N; Deng Y; Ciarleglio M; Garcia-Tsao G
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2373-2380. PubMed ID: 27663656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective Validation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of a New Point Shear Wave Elastographic Technique for Assessing Liver Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.
    Ahn SJ; Lee JM; Chang W; Lee SM; Kang HJ; Yang H; Yoon JH; Park SJ; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(6):926-935. PubMed ID: 29089825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision and Test-Retest Repeatability of Stiffness Measurement with MR Elastography: A Multicenter Phantom Study.
    Ozkaya E; Kennedy P; Chen J; Bane O; Dillman JR; Jhaveri KS; Ohliger MA; Rossman PJ; Tkach JA; Doucette JT; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e233136. PubMed ID: 38742971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR elastography in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease at 1.5T: Intraindividual comparison of gradient-recalled echo versus spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences and investigation of potential confounding factors.
    Plaikner M; Kremser C; Zoller H; Kannengiesser S; Henninger B
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109898. PubMed ID: 34388628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.
    Morisaka H; Motosugi U; Glaser KJ; Ichikawa S; Ehman RL; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Onishi H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 45(4):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 27662640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liver Stiffness Measurements with MR Elastography: Agreement and Repeatability across Imaging Systems, Field Strengths, and Pulse Sequences.
    Trout AT; Serai S; Mahley AD; Wang H; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Dillman JR
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 27285061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee Yj; Lee JM; Lee JE; Lee KB; Lee ES; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 23589232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.