These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26470521)

  • 41. Outcomes of implants and restorations placed in general dental practices: a retrospective study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network.
    Da Silva JD; Kazimiroff J; Papas A; Curro FA; Thompson VP; Vena DA; Wu H; Collie D; Craig RG;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Jul; 145(7):704-13. PubMed ID: 24982276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dentists' perspective about dental amalgam: current use and future direction.
    Bakhurji E; Scott T; Mangione T; Sohn W
    J Public Health Dent; 2017 Jun; 77(3):207-215. PubMed ID: 28070905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam.
    Sharif MO; Merry A; Catleugh M; Tickle M; Brunton P; Dunne SM; Aggarwal VR; Chong LY
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD005970. PubMed ID: 24510713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors influencing root canal retreatment strategies by general practitioners and specialists in Australia.
    Wenteler GL; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2015 May; 48(5):417-27. PubMed ID: 24916003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In your dental practice, is dental amalgam still the restorative material of choice?
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Aug; 133(8):1046. PubMed ID: 12198982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Removal, replacement and placement of amalgam restorations by Ontario dentists in 2002.
    Adegbembo AO; Watson PA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):565. PubMed ID: 16202194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Hall AC; Randall RC; Widstrom E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(11):613-8; discussion 609. PubMed ID: 12819697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Restorative treatment decisions for deep proximal carious lesions in primary molars.
    Qudeimat MA; Al-Saiegh FA; Al-Omari Q; Omar R
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17394889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 5: knowledge factors.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Dec; 62(4):440-452. PubMed ID: 28542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Louis DR; Litaker MS; Minyé HM; Mungia R; Gordan VV; Marshall DG; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):882-890. PubMed ID: 27492046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
    Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Factors affecting the amount of long-term restorative dental treatment provided to 100 patients by 20 dentists in 3 Adelaide private practices.
    Hawthorne WS; Smales RJ
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Aug; 41(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 8870281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options.
    Janus C; Sbeih I; Best AM
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 22313920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Examiner agreement in the replacement decision of Class I amalgam restorations.
    Ermis RB; Aydin U
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 15150636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations.
    Browning WD; Dennison JB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8957906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Brazilian dentists' restorative treatment decisions.
    Traebert J; Marcenes W; Kreutz JV; Oliveira R; Piazza CH; Peres MA
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2005; 3(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15921338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: II. Rubber Dam Isolation.
    Varughese RE; Andrews P; Sigal MJ; Azarpazhooh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016 Nov; 38(7):497-501. PubMed ID: 28281955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.