204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26471454)
1. 3DRobot: automated generation of diverse and well-packed protein structure decoys.
Deng H; Jia Y; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 26471454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.
Zhang Y; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
Biophys J; 2003 Aug; 85(2):1145-64. PubMed ID: 12885659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A homology/ab initio hybrid algorithm for sampling near-native protein conformations.
Dhingra P; Jayaram B
J Comput Chem; 2013 Aug; 34(22):1925-36. PubMed ID: 23728619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using physical features of protein core packing to distinguish real proteins from decoys.
Grigas AT; Mei Z; Treado JD; Levine ZA; Regan L; O'Hern CS
Protein Sci; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1931-1944. PubMed ID: 32710566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel high resolution Calpha--Calpha distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set.
Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):726-41. PubMed ID: 16981202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A model of local-minima distribution on conformational space and its application to protein structure prediction.
Li H
Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):985-91. PubMed ID: 16838344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate disulfide-bonding network predictions improve ab initio structure prediction of cysteine-rich proteins.
Yang J; He BJ; Jang R; Zhang Y; Shen HB
Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(23):3773-81. PubMed ID: 26254435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction.
Zhang J; Zhang Y
PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e15386. PubMed ID: 21060880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. STRUM: structure-based prediction of protein stability changes upon single-point mutation.
Quan L; Lv Q; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 32(19):2936-46. PubMed ID: 27318206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou H; Zhou Y
Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions.
Wang K; Fain B; Levitt M; Samudrala R
BMC Struct Biol; 2004 Jun; 4():8. PubMed ID: 15207004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new pairwise folding potential based on improved decoy generation and side-chain packing.
Loose C; Klepeis JL; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):303-14. PubMed ID: 14696192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NeBcon: protein contact map prediction using neural network training coupled with naïve Bayes classifiers.
He B; Mortuza SM; Wang Y; Shen HB; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2017 Aug; 33(15):2296-2306. PubMed ID: 28369334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep convolutional networks for quality assessment of protein folds.
Derevyanko G; Grudinin S; Bengio Y; Lamoureux G
Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 34(23):4046-4053. PubMed ID: 29931128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fragment-free approach to protein folding using conditional neural fields.
Zhao F; Peng J; Xu J
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i310-7. PubMed ID: 20529922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.
Zhang Y; Skolnick J
J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 15011258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two optimization methods to derive energy parameters for protein folding: perceptron and Z score.
Vendruscolo M; Mirny LA; Shakhnovich EI; Domany E
Proteins; 2000 Nov; 41(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 10966572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
