117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26471796)
21. Influence of prostate-specific antigen testing on the spectrum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice.
Amling CL; Blute ML; Lerner SE; Bergstralh EJ; Bostwick DG; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 May; 73(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 9581578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years.
Amling CL; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Seay TM; Slezak J; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jul; 164(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 10840432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1C adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Carter HB; Sauvageot J; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 1997 Jun; 157(6):2206-9. PubMed ID: 9146616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome.
Pinthus JH; Witkos M; Fleshner NE; Sweet J; Evans A; Jewett MA; Krahn M; Alibhai S; Trachtenberg J
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):979-84; discussion 984. PubMed ID: 16890675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Has there been a recent shift in the pathological features and prognosis of patients treated with radical prostatectomy?
Soh S; Kattan MW; Berkman S; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Urol; 1997 Jun; 157(6):2212-8. PubMed ID: 9146618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Indications for preoperative prostate biopsy in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer.
Thomas C; Wiesner C; Melchior S; Gillitzer R; Schmidt F; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1938-41; discussion 1941. PubMed ID: 18801501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy.
Miyamoto H; Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1693-8. PubMed ID: 19683331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. PSA velocity is associated with gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen: marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Loeb S; Sutherland DE; D'Amico AV; Roehl KA; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1116-20; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 18571700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is clinical stage T2c prostate cancer an intermediate- or high-risk disease?
Klaassen Z; Singh AA; Howard LE; Feng Z; Trock B; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Partin A; Han M; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1414-21. PubMed ID: 25492369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
