176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26472106)
1. Distinguishing grade I meningioma from higher grade meningiomas without biopsy.
Varlotto J; Flickinger J; Pavelic MT; Specht CS; Sheehan JM; Timek DT; Glantz MJ; Sogge S; Dimaio C; Moser R; Yunus S; Fitzgerald TJ; Upadhyay U; Rava P; Tangel M; Yao A; Kanekar S
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(35):38421-8. PubMed ID: 26472106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-parametric qualitative and quantitative MRI assessment as predictor of histological grading in previously treated meningiomas.
Sacco S; Ballati F; Gaetani C; Lomoro P; Farina LM; Bacila A; Imparato S; Paganelli C; Buizza G; Iannalfi A; Baroni G; Valvo F; Bastianello S; Preda L
Neuroradiology; 2020 Nov; 62(11):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32583368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between tumor location, size, and WHO grade in meningioma.
Magill ST; Young JS; Chae R; Aghi MK; Theodosopoulos PV; McDermott MW
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Apr; 44(4):E4. PubMed ID: 29606048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A radiopathological classification of dural tail sign of meningiomas.
Qi ST; Liu Y; Pan J; Chotai S; Fang LX
J Neurosurg; 2012 Oct; 117(4):645-53. PubMed ID: 22839654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Between Maligant and Benign Meningiomas. A Multicenter Analysis.
Surov A; Ginat DT; Sanverdi E; Lim CCT; Hakyemez B; Yogi A; Cabada T; Wienke A
World Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 88():598-602. PubMed ID: 26529294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic location is a risk factor for atypical and malignant meningiomas.
Kane AJ; Sughrue ME; Rutkowski MJ; Shangari G; Fang S; McDermott MW; Berger MS; Parsa AT
Cancer; 2011 Mar; 117(6):1272-8. PubMed ID: 21381014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics to distinguish microcystic meningiomas from traditional Grade I meningiomas and high-grade gliomas.
Hussain NS; Moisi MD; Keogh B; McCullough BJ; Rostad S; Newell D; Gwinn R; Foltz G; Mayberg M; Aguedan B; Good V; Fouke SJ
J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 126(4):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 27285539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of volumetric growth and histological grade in 50 meningiomas.
Soon WC; Fountain DM; Koczyk K; Abdulla M; Giri S; Allinson K; Matys T; Guilfoyle MR; Kirollos RW; Santarius T
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Nov; 159(11):2169-2177. PubMed ID: 28791500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can amide proton transfer-weighted imaging differentiate tumor grade and predict Ki-67 proliferation status of meningioma?
Yu H; Wen X; Wu P; Chen Y; Zou T; Wang X; Jiang S; Zhou J; Wen Z
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5298-5306. PubMed ID: 30887206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of MR Morphology and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Meningiomas: Radio-Pathologic Correlation.
Ranabhat K; Bishokarma S; Agrawal P; Shrestha P; Panth R; Ghimire RK
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(215):37-44. PubMed ID: 31080244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ki-67 index as a predictive marker of meningioma recurrence following surgical resection.
Mizrachi M; Hartley B; Saleem S; Hintz E; Ziemba Y; Li J; Goenka A; Schulder M
J Clin Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 124():15-19. PubMed ID: 38631196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient's age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema.
Ressel A; Fichte S; Brodhun M; Rosahl SK; Gerlach R
J Neurooncol; 2019 Nov; 145(2):277-286. PubMed ID: 31578671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignant potential of skull base versus non-skull base meningiomas: clinical series of 1,663 cases.
Cornelius JF; Slotty PJ; Steiger HJ; Hänggi D; Polivka M; George B
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Mar; 155(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 23318687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to predict the consistency and vascularity of meningiomas by MRI: an institutional experience.
Winter F; Furtner J; Pleyel A; Woehrer A; Callegari K; Hosmann A; Herta J; Roessler K; Dorfer C
Neurol Res; 2021 Aug; 43(8):693-699. PubMed ID: 33906575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk Factors for High-Grade Meningioma in Brain and Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Shin HK; Park JH; Cho YH; Kim YH; Hong SH; Kim JH; Roh SW; Jeon SR
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e718-e730. PubMed ID: 33974984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. WHO grade, proliferation index, and progesterone receptor expression are different according to the location of meningioma.
Maiuri F; Mariniello G; Guadagno E; Barbato M; Corvino S; Del Basso De Caro M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Dec; 161(12):2553-2561. PubMed ID: 31637512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management.
Gousias K; Schramm J; Simon M
J Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 125(3):551-60. PubMed ID: 26824369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Role of Pre-Operative MRI for Prediction of High-Grade Intracranial Meningioma: A Retrospective Study.
Radeesri K; Lekhavat V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Mar; 24(3):819-825. PubMed ID: 36974533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracranial grade I meningiomas: Confrontation between histological examination and magnetic resonance imaging.
Zehani A; Houcine Y; Chelly I; Arous A; Drissi C; Haouet S; Kchir N
Tunis Med; 2018 Jan; 96(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 30324987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling in grading and differentiating histological subgroups of meningiomas.
Lu Y; Xiong J; Yin B; Wen J; Liu L; Geng D
Clin Radiol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):176-184. PubMed ID: 29031810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
