These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26472279)

  • 1. Temporal dynamics and potential neural sources of goal conduciveness, control, and power appraisal.
    Gentsch K; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Dec; 112():77-93. PubMed ID: 26472279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal dynamics of event-related potentials related to goal conduciveness and power appraisals.
    Gentsch K; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Oct; 50(10):1010-22. PubMed ID: 23829421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appraisals Generate Specific Configurations of Facial Muscle Movements in a Gambling Task: Evidence for the Component Process Model of Emotion.
    Gentsch K; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135837. PubMed ID: 26295338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coherence explored between emotion components: evidence from event-related potentials and facial electromyography.
    Gentsch K; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Apr; 98():70-81. PubMed ID: 24315953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Appraisal-driven somatovisceral response patterning: effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness.
    Aue T; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18495321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goal relevance and goal conduciveness appraisals lead to differential autonomic reactivity in emotional responding to performance feedback.
    Kreibig SD; Gendolla GH; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Dec; 91(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 22947258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness appraisals on somatovisceral responding: Somewhat similar, but not identical.
    Aue T; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 21029762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential unfolding of appraisals: EEG evidence for the interaction of novelty and pleasantness.
    van Peer JM; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 24219392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?
    Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of age on the neural correlates of feedback processing in a naturalistic gambling game.
    West R; Tiernan BN; Kieffaber PD; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):734-45. PubMed ID: 24758702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adapting another person's affective state modulates brain potentials to unpleasant pictures.
    Paul S; Endrass T; Kathmann N; Simon D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():81-87. PubMed ID: 27587332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational reproducibility of "Goal relevance and goal conduciveness appraisals lead to differential autonomic reactivity in emotional responding to performance feedback" (Kreibig, Gendolla, & Scherer, 2012): A guide and new evidence.
    Kreibig SD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Sep; 119():93-107. PubMed ID: 28600152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal Unfolding of Micro-valences in Facial Expression Evoked by Visual, Auditory, and Olfactory Stimuli.
    Gentsch K; Beermann U; Wu L; Trznadel S; Scherer KR
    Affect Sci; 2020; 1(4):208-224. PubMed ID: 33283200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysiological effects of emotional responding to goal attainment.
    Kreibig SD; Gendolla GH; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Jul; 84(3):474-87. PubMed ID: 19941932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feedback related brain activity in a gambling task: a temporal analysis of EEG correlates.
    Lucchiari C; Pravettoni G
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Dec; 51(6):449-54. PubMed ID: 20704690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The mystery remains: breadth of attention in Flanker and Navon tasks unaffected by affective states induced by an appraisal manipulation.
    Kolnes M; Gentsch K; van Steenbergen H; Uusberg A
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Aug; 36(5):836-854. PubMed ID: 35358017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The valence strength of unpleasant emotion modulates brain processing of behavioral inhibitory control: neural correlates.
    Yuan J; Meng X; Yang J; Yao G; Hu L; Yuan H
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 22056697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Brain's Reward Response Occurs Even Without Actual Reward!
    Fielding A; Fu Y; Franz EA
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Jun; 34(2):449-463. PubMed ID: 29027071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive emotion, appraisal, and the role of appraisal overlap in positive emotion co-occurrence.
    Tong EMW; Jia L
    Emotion; 2017 Feb; 17(1):40-54. PubMed ID: 27398905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.