These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26472303)

  • 1. Comparison of two alternative technical marker sets for measuring 3D pelvic motion during gait.
    Bruno P; Barden J
    J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(14):3876-82. PubMed ID: 26472303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of different pelvic technical marker sets upon hip kinematics during gait.
    Langley B; Page R; Greig M
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():74-78. PubMed ID: 31015185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a method to accurately correct anterior superior iliac spine marker occlusion.
    Hoffman JT; McNally MP; Wordeman SC; Hewett TE
    J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1224-8. PubMed ID: 25704531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pelvic Sagittal Torsion Caused by Induced Leg Length Discrepancy: Geometrical Illusion May Influence Measures Based on Superior-iliac Spines Positions.
    Souza TR; Almeida RP; Pires CV; Pinto VA; Gonçalves BT; Carvalho DS; Barsante LD; Fonseca ST
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 Feb; 44(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 33431280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative technical marker set for the pelvis is more repeatable than the standard pelvic marker set.
    Borhani M; McGregor AH; Bull AM
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):1032-7. PubMed ID: 23790572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of alternative technical markers for the pelvic coordinate system.
    Kisho Fukuchi R; Arakaki C; Veras Orselli MI; Duarte M
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):592-4. PubMed ID: 19880124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-validation of marker configurations to measure pelvic kinematics in gait.
    Vogt L; Portscher M; Brettmann K; Pfeifer K; Banzer W
    Gait Posture; 2003 Dec; 18(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 14667951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative modelling procedures for pelvic marker occlusion during motion analysis.
    McClelland JA; Webster KE; Grant C; Feller J
    Gait Posture; 2010 Apr; 31(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 20176486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a lateral pelvic cluster technical system in evaluating running kinematics.
    Liew BXW; Morris S; Robinson MA; Netto K
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1989-1993. PubMed ID: 27207384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of a video-based marker-less tracking system for gait analysis.
    Ong A; Harris IS; Hamill J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Aug; 20(10):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 28569549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of wand markers on the pelvis in three dimensional gait analysis.
    Smith M; Curtis D; Bencke J; Stebbins J
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):1070-3. PubMed ID: 23707508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of equine sacral and iliac motion during gait: a comparison between motion capture with skin-mounted and bone-fixated sensors.
    Goff L; Van Weeren PR; Jeffcott L; Condie P; McGowan C
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2010 Nov; (38):468-74. PubMed ID: 21059047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of 3D multi-segment lumbar spine motion during gait and prone hip extension.
    Ryan N; Bruno P
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2017 Apr; 33():111-117. PubMed ID: 28259003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation.
    Chang TL; Sponseller PD; Kebaish KM; Fishman EK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 19247163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in hip-knee joint coupling during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Gribbin TC; Slater LV; Herb CC; Hart JM; Chapman RM; Hertel J; Kuenze CM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():64-71. PubMed ID: 26851564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: Comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system.
    Bolink SA; Naisas H; Senden R; Essers H; Heyligers IC; Meijer K; Grimm B
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 26711470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two methods of calculating thorax kinematics in children with myelomeningocele.
    Nguyen TC; Baker R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):1060-5. PubMed ID: 15531057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Anatomical and Functional Hip Joint Center Methods: The Effects of Activity Type, Gender, and Proximal Reference Segment.
    McGibbon CA; Fowler J; Chase S; Steeves K; Landry J; Mohamed A
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Jan; 138(1):. PubMed ID: 26594023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sagittal plane pelvis motion influences transverse plane motion of the femur: Kinematic coupling at the hip joint.
    Bagwell JJ; Fukuda TY; Powers CM
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():120-4. PubMed ID: 26471322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screw-Home Movement of the Tibiofemoral Joint during Normal Gait: Three-Dimensional Analysis.
    Kim HY; Kim KJ; Yang DS; Jeung SW; Choi HG; Choy WS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Sep; 7(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 26330951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.