These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26472680)

  • 1. A Comparison of Apical Bacterial Extrusion in Manual, ProTaper Rotary, and One Shape Rotary Instrumentation Techniques.
    Mittal R; Singla MG; Garg A; Dhawan A
    J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 26472680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
    Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.
    Taneja S; Kumari M; Barua M; Dudeja C; Malik M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25961619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems.
    Silva EJ; Carapiá MF; Lopes RM; Belladonna FG; Senna PM; Souza EM; De-Deus G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Jul; 49(7):700-5. PubMed ID: 26174577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Aktı A; Tuncay Ö; Dinçer AN; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2066-9. PubMed ID: 25443282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
    Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.
    Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Yılmaz N
    Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24863544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Instrumentation Techniques and Preparation Taper on Apical Extrusion of Bacteria.
    Aksel H; Küçükkaya Eren S; Çakar A; Serper A; Özkuyumcu C; Azim AA
    J Endod; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1008-1010. PubMed ID: 28416303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
    De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
    Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reciprocating versus rotary systems for root filling removal: assessment of the apically extruded material.
    Silva EJ; Sá L; Belladonna FG; Neves AA; Accorsi-Mendonça T; Vieira VT; De-Deus G; Moreira EJ
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2077-80. PubMed ID: 25442728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study.
    Ghogre P; Chourasia HR; Agarwal M; Singh MP; Gurav S; Ghogre R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 26481889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.