359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26473651)
1. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Factors Associated With Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Rectal Cancer: A Binational Registry Study.
Warrier SK; Kong JC; Guerra GR; Chittleborough TJ; Naik A; Ramsay RG; Lynch AC; Heriot AG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 29521824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Distal Resection Margin of ≤1 mm and Rectal Cancer Recurrence After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery: The Role of a Positive Distal Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery.
Zeng WG; Liu MJ; Zhou ZX; Wang ZJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 28991082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision.
Lin HH; Lin JK; Lin CC; Lan YT; Wang HS; Yang SH; Jiang JK; Chen WS; Lin TC; Liang WY; Chang SC
Am J Surg; 2013 Nov; 206(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 23871321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter study of outcome in relation to the type of resection in rectal cancer.
Ortiz H; Wibe A; Ciga MA; Kreisler E; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jul; 57(7):811-22. PubMed ID: 24901681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer depends on location of the tumor.
Peschaud F; Cuenod CA; Benoist S; Julié C; Beauchet A; Siauve N; Taieb-Kasbi F; Penna C; Nordlinger B
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Aug; 48(8):1603-9. PubMed ID: 15937629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Features of Late Recurrence Following Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer.
Oh BY; Yun HR; Kim SH; Yun SH; Kim HC; Lee WY; Chun HK; Cho YB
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Nov; 58(11):1041-7. PubMed ID: 26445176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A circumferential resection margin of 1 mm is a negative prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Park JS; Huh JW; Park YA; Cho YB; Yun SH; Kim HC; Lee WY; Chun HK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Aug; 57(8):933-40. PubMed ID: 25003288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the Role of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Jafari MD; Gahagan JV; Inaba CS; Koh CY; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
Ann Surg; 2017 Oct; 266(4):574-581. PubMed ID: 28650357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery.
Tilney HS; Rasheed S; Northover JM; Tekkis PP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Oct; 52(10):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19966604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution.
Hara M; Sng K; Yoo BE; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kim SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 24819096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term prognostic value of mesorectal grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Madbouly KM; Hussein AM; Abdelzaher E
Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 24581995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prognostic analysis of middle and lower rectal cancer with different degrees of infiltration in mesorectum].
Zhuo HQ; Zhou YB; Lü L; Zhou J; Yang WY; Li YJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(12):820-2. PubMed ID: 19595121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
