These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26473983)

  • 21. Protein structure prediction using residue- and fragment-environment potentials in CASP11.
    Kim H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):105-17. PubMed ID: 26344195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protein structure refinement via molecular-dynamics simulations: What works and what does not?
    Feig M; Mirjalili V
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):282-92. PubMed ID: 26234208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved de novo structure prediction in CASP11 by incorporating coevolution information into Rosetta.
    Ovchinnikov S; Kim DE; Wang RY; Liu Y; DiMaio F; Baker D
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26677056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Protein structure refinement with adaptively restrained homologous replicas.
    Della Corte D; Wildberg A; Schröder GF
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():302-13. PubMed ID: 26441154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effective protein model structure refinement by loop modeling and overall relaxation.
    Lee GR; Heo L; Seok C
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():293-301. PubMed ID: 26172288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.
    Schaarschmidt J; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Bonvin AMJJ
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):51-66. PubMed ID: 29071738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.
    Moult J; Fidelis K; Kryshtafovych A; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-14. PubMed ID: 27171127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CASP11 refinement experiments with ROSETTA.
    Park H; DiMaio F; Baker D
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):314-22. PubMed ID: 26205421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Target highlights in CASP13: Experimental target structures through the eyes of their authors.
    Lepore R; Kryshtafovych A; Alahuhta M; Veraszto HA; Bomble YJ; Bufton JC; Bullock AN; Caba C; Cao H; Davies OR; Desfosses A; Dunne M; Fidelis K; Goulding CW; Gurusaran M; Gutsche I; Harding CJ; Hartmann MD; Hayes CS; Joachimiak A; Leiman PG; Loppnau P; Lovering AL; Lunin VV; Michalska K; Mir-Sanchis I; Mitra AK; Moult J; Phillips GN; Pinkas DM; Rice PA; Tong Y; Topf M; Walton JD; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1037-1057. PubMed ID: 31442339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11.
    Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):349-69. PubMed ID: 26344049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Target highlights in CASP14: Analysis of models by structure providers.
    Alexander LT; Lepore R; Kryshtafovych A; Adamopoulos A; Alahuhta M; Arvin AM; Bomble YJ; Böttcher B; Breyton C; Chiarini V; Chinnam NB; Chiu W; Fidelis K; Grinter R; Gupta GD; Hartmann MD; Hayes CS; Heidebrecht T; Ilari A; Joachimiak A; Kim Y; Linares R; Lovering AL; Lunin VV; Lupas AN; Makbul C; Michalska K; Moult J; Mukherjee PK; Nutt WS; Oliver SL; Perrakis A; Stols L; Tainer JA; Topf M; Tsutakawa SE; Valdivia-Delgado M; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1647-1672. PubMed ID: 34561912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.
    Huwe PJ; Xu Q; Shapovalov MV; Modi V; Andrake MD; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):370-91. PubMed ID: 27181425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Challenging the state of the art in protein structure prediction: Highlights of experimental target structures for the 10th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Experiment CASP10.
    Kryshtafovych A; Moult J; Bales P; Bazan JF; Biasini M; Burgin A; Chen C; Cochran FV; Craig TK; Das R; Fass D; Garcia-Doval C; Herzberg O; Lorimer D; Luecke H; Ma X; Nelson DC; van Raaij MJ; Rohwer F; Segall A; Seguritan V; Zeth K; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):26-42. PubMed ID: 24318984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved protein contact predictions with the MetaPSICOV2 server in CASP12.
    Buchan DWA; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):78-83. PubMed ID: 28901583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling and minimizing CAPRI round 30 symmetrical protein complexes from CASP-11 structural models.
    El Houasli M; Maigret B; Devignes MD; Ghoorah AW; Grudinin S; Ritchie DW
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):463-469. PubMed ID: 27701764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round 6.
    Moult J; Fidelis K; Rost B; Hubbard T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2005; 61 Suppl 7():3-7. PubMed ID: 16187341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Protein structure modeling and refinement by global optimization in CASP12.
    Hong SH; Joung I; Flores-Canales JC; Manavalan B; Cheng Q; Heo S; Kim JY; Lee SY; Nam M; Joo K; Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():122-135. PubMed ID: 29159837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Princeton_TIGRESS 2.0: High refinement consistency and net gains through support vector machines and molecular dynamics in double-blind predictions during the CASP11 experiment.
    Khoury GA; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Koskosidis AJ; Guzman YA; Tamamis P; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1078-1098. PubMed ID: 28241391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computational models in the service of X-ray and cryo-electron microscopy structure determination.
    Kryshtafovych A; Moult J; Albrecht R; Chang GA; Chao K; Fraser A; Greenfield J; Hartmann MD; Herzberg O; Josts I; Leiman PG; Linden SB; Lupas AN; Nelson DC; Rees SD; Shang X; Sokolova ML; Tidow H;
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1633-1646. PubMed ID: 34449113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. pyDock scoring for the new modeling challenges in docking: Protein-peptide, homo-multimers, and domain-domain interactions.
    Pallara C; Jiménez-García B; Romero M; Moal IH; Fernández-Recio J
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 27701776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.