335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26474500)
1. PEEK-Halo effect in interbody fusion.
Phan K; Hogan JA; Assem Y; Mobbs RJ
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 24():138-40. PubMed ID: 26474500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PEEK Versus Ti Interbody Fusion Devices: Resultant Fusion, Bone Apposition, Initial and 26-Week Biomechanics.
Pelletier MH; Cordaro N; Punjabi VM; Waites M; Lau A; Walsh WR
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 May; 29(4):E208-14. PubMed ID: 22801456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combination Ti/PEEK ALIF cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Early clinical and radiological results.
Mobbs RJ; Phan K; Assem Y; Pelletier M; Walsh WR
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 34():94-99. PubMed ID: 27469413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.
Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Christou C; He J; Vizesi F; Boden SD
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 29496625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.
Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion.
Wu SH; Li Y; Zhang YQ; Li XK; Yuan CF; Hao YL; Zhang ZY; Guo Z
Artif Organs; 2013 Dec; 37(12):E191-201. PubMed ID: 24147953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porous PEEK improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK.
Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Potter D; Safranski DL; Sulchek TA; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Biomaterials; 2018 Dec; 185():106-116. PubMed ID: 30236838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vivo Osseointegration Performance of Titanium Dioxide Coating Modified Polyetheretherketone Using Arc Ion Plating for Spinal Implant Application.
Tsou HK; Chi MH; Hung YW; Chung CJ; He JL
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():328943. PubMed ID: 26504800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration.
Rao PJ; Pelletier MH; Walsh WR; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2014 May; 6(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 24890288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anti-infective and osteointegration properties of silicon nitride, poly(ether ether ketone), and titanium implants.
Webster TJ; Patel AA; Rahaman MN; Sonny Bal B
Acta Biomater; 2012 Dec; 8(12):4447-54. PubMed ID: 22863905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?
Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Bertollo N; Christou C; Tan C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2364-2372. PubMed ID: 27549990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) titanium composite interbody spacer in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model: biomechanical, microcomputed tomographic, and histologic analyses.
McGilvray KC; Waldorff EI; Easley J; Seim HB; Zhang N; Linovitz RJ; Ryaby JT; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1907-1916. PubMed ID: 28751242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.
Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration.
Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Safranski DL; Potter D; Sulchek T; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E417-E424. PubMed ID: 31703050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impaction durability of porous polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK interbody fusion devices.
Torstrick FB; Klosterhoff BS; Westerlund LE; Foley KT; Gochuico J; Lee CSD; Gall K; Safranski DL
Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):857-865. PubMed ID: 29366985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating Osseointegration Into a Deeply Porous Titanium Scaffold: A Biomechanical Comparison With PEEK and Allograft.
Guyer RD; Abitbol JJ; Ohnmeiss DD; Yao C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41(19):E1146-E1150. PubMed ID: 27135643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
