189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26474646)
1. [Challenges for clinical trials in oncology within the scope of early benefit assessment of drugs].
Lange S
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(6):417-30. PubMed ID: 26474646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Patient-relevant outcomes and surrogates in the early benefit assessment of drugs: first experiences].
Kvitkina T; ten Haaf A; Reken S; McGauran N; Wieseler B
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):528-38. PubMed ID: 25523852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany - results from 2011 to 2012.
Hörn H; Nink K; McGauran N; Wieseler B
Health Policy; 2014 Jun; 116(2-3):147-53. PubMed ID: 24472328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports.
Köhler M; Haag S; Biester K; Brockhaus AC; McGauran N; Grouven U; Kölsch H; Seay U; Hörn H; Moritz G; Staeck K; Wieseler B
BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h796. PubMed ID: 25722024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Crossover in Oncology Clinical Trials on Evidence Levels in Early Benefit Assessment in Germany.
Isbary G; Staab TR; Amelung VE; Dintsios CM; Iking-Konert C; Nesurini SM; Walter M; Ruof J
Value Health; 2018 Jun; 21(6):698-706. PubMed ID: 29909875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological approach to determine minor, considerable, and major treatment effects in the early benefit assessment of new drugs.
Skipka G; Wieseler B; Kaiser T; Thomas S; Bender R; Windeler J; Lange S
Biom J; 2016 Jan; 58(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 26134089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cancer: Is it really so different? Particularities of oncologic drugs from the perspective of the pharmaceutical regulatory agency].
Enzmann H; Broich K
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 23663906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Involvement of scientific societies in early benefit assessment: Simulated participation or valuable additional input?].
Bleß HH; Seidlitz C; Ohlmeier C; de Millas C
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Feb; 130():49-57. PubMed ID: 29103831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Adjusted and Unadjusted Indirect Comparison Methods in Benefit Assessment. A Simulation Study for Time-to-event Endpoints.
Kühnast S; Schiffner-Rohe J; Rahnenführer J; Leverkus F
Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 28361159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Drug assessment: IQWiG, G-BA, and an international comparison].
Glaeske G
Internist (Berl); 2016 Jan; 57(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 26502888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of endpoints used in marketing authorisations versus value assessments of oncology medicines in Germany.
Ruof J; Knoerzer D; Dünne AA; Dintsios CM; Staab T; Schwartz FW
Health Policy; 2014 Nov; 118(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 25194474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.
Le Tourneau C; Delord JP; Gonçalves A; Gavoille C; Dubot C; Isambert N; Campone M; Trédan O; Massiani MA; Mauborgne C; Armanet S; Servant N; Bièche I; Bernard V; Gentien D; Jezequel P; Attignon V; Boyault S; Vincent-Salomon A; Servois V; Sablin MP; Kamal M; Paoletti X;
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Oct; 16(13):1324-34. PubMed ID: 26342236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early benefit assessment (EBA) in Germany: analysing decisions 18 months after introducing the new AMNOG legislation.
Ruof J; Schwartz FW; Schulenburg JM; Dintsios CM
Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Jul; 15(6):577-89. PubMed ID: 23771769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a possible predictor for Federal Joint Committee decisions on early benefit assessments according to the German act on the reform of the market for medicinal products.
Schwander B; Banz K; Kaier K; Walzer S
Health Policy; 2014 Sep; 117(3):334-44. PubMed ID: 25059744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological problems in the method used by IQWiG within early benefit assessment of new pharmaceuticals in Germany.
Herpers M; Dintsios CM
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Feb; 20(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 29696458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals in Germany: manufacturers' expectations versus the Federal Joint Committee's decisions.
Fischer KE; Stargardt T
Med Decis Making; 2014 Nov; 34(8):1030-47. PubMed ID: 25149822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Four years of early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany: a qualitative study on methodological requirements for quality of life data.
Blome C; Augustin M; Metin H; Lohrberg D
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Mar; 18(2):181-193. PubMed ID: 26837412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
