These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Longitudinal Voice Outcomes After Voice Therapy in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis. Busto-Crespo O; Uzcanga-Lacabe M; Abad-Marco A; Berasategui I; García L; Maraví E; Aguilera-Albesa S; Fernández-Montero A; Fernández-González S J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):767.e9-767.e15. PubMed ID: 26658167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of category goodness of /t/ and /k/ in typical and misarticulated children's speech. Strömbergsson S; Salvi G; House D J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3422-35. PubMed ID: 26093431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Perceptual, Aerodynamic and Acoustic Evaluation of Vocal Characteristics in Subjects With Obesity. Munjal S; Sharma A; Chhabra N; Panda N J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):660-665. PubMed ID: 34969555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. Jannetts S; Lowit A J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) vs Praat for Assessing Euphonic Subjects: A Preliminary Study on the Gender-discriminating Power of Acoustic Analysis Software. Lovato A; De Colle W; Giacomelli L; Piacente A; Righetto L; Marioni G; de Filippis C J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e1-765.e5. PubMed ID: 26975896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients. Pribuisiene R; Uloza V; Kupcinskas L; Jonaitis L J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 15925484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality. Sofranko JL; Prosek RA J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization. Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Vocal outcome after CO2 laser cordectomy performed on patients affected by early glottic carcinoma. Galletti B; Freni F; Cammaroto G; Catalano N; Gangemi G; Galletti F J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):801-5. PubMed ID: 22717493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Psychoacoustic scaling of acoustic voice parameters by multicenter voice ratings]. Schönweiler R; Wübbelt P; Hess M; Ptok M Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Mar; 80(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11320872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups. Cho SW; Yin CS; Park YB; Park YJ J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 21051198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Objective voice analysis of Iranian speakers with normal voices. Dehqan A; Ansari H; Bakhtiar M J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19230602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]