These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26474828)

  • 1. On the use of dense SNP marker data for the identification of distant relative pairs.
    Sun M; Jobling MA; Taliun D; Pramstaller PP; Egeland T; Sheehan NA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():14-25. PubMed ID: 26474828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Set up of cutoff thresholds for kinship determination using SNP loci.
    Cho S; Shin ES; Yu HJ; Lee JH; Seo HJ; Kim MY; Lee SD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():1-8. PubMed ID: 28342368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the use of dense sets of SNP markers and their potential in relationship inference.
    Kling D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():19-31. PubMed ID: 30529859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the effects of genetic linkage when using a combination of STR and SNP loci for kinship testing.
    Yang D; Ma SX; Zhao GL; Gao A; Xu ZK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Jul; 69():102441. PubMed ID: 38599008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.
    Kim J; Edge MD; Algee-Hewitt BFB; Li JZ; Rosenberg NA
    Cell; 2018 Oct; 175(3):848-858.e6. PubMed ID: 30318150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pairwise kinship testing with microhaplotypes: Can advancements be made in kinship inference with these markers?
    Wu R; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Shen X; Hao B; Wang Q; Sun H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110875. PubMed ID: 34166816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
    Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers.
    Abecasis GR; Wigginton JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Nov; 77(5):754-67. PubMed ID: 16252236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On inferring presence of an individual in a mixture: a Bayesian approach.
    Clayton D
    Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):661-73. PubMed ID: 20522729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pairwise kinship testing with a combination of STR and SNP loci.
    Zhang Q; Zhou Z; Wang L; Quan C; Liu Q; Tang Z; Liu L; Liu Y; Wang S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102265. PubMed ID: 32145445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consanguinity and the transmission/disequilibrium test for allelic association.
    Bennett S; Curnow RN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11443735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient Estimation of Realized Kinship from Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotypes.
    Wang B; Sverdlov S; Thompson E
    Genetics; 2017 Mar; 205(3):1063-1078. PubMed ID: 28100587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of linkage and linkage disequilibrium for eight X-STR markers.
    Tillmar AO; Mostad P; Egeland T; Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Montelius K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Dec; 3(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19083865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis.
    Tillmar AO; Kling D; Butler JM; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Egeland T; Gusmão L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():269-275. PubMed ID: 28544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.
    Kelmemi W; Teeuw ME; Bochdanovits Z; Ouburg S; Jonker MA; Alkuraya F; Hashem M; Kayserili H; van Haeringen A; Sheridan E; Masri A; Cobben JM; Rizzu P; Kostense PJ; Dommering CJ; Henneman L; Bouhamed-Chaabouni H; Heutink P; Ten Kate LP; Cornel MC
    BMC Med Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():50. PubMed ID: 26188928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pairwise Kinship Analysis by the Index of Chromosome Sharing Using High-Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.
    Morimoto C; Manabe S; Kawaguchi T; Kawai C; Fujimoto S; Hamano Y; Yamada R; Matsuda F; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0160287. PubMed ID: 27472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using identity by descent estimation with dense genotype data to detect positive selection.
    Han L; Abney M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Feb; 21(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 22781100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large-scale identification of human bone remains via SNP microarray analysis with reference SNP database.
    Cho S; Kim MY; Lee JH; Lee HY; Lee SD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102293. PubMed ID: 32276230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.