These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26474828)

  • 21. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium and its effect on non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis using two high density single-nucleotide polymorphism mapping panels.
    Murray SS
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S85. PubMed ID: 16451700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian estimates of linkage disequilibrium.
    Sebastiani P; Abad-Grau MM
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jun; 8():36. PubMed ID: 17592642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Joint modeling of linkage and association: identifying SNPs responsible for a linkage signal.
    Li M; Boehnke M; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jun; 76(6):934-49. PubMed ID: 15877278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using object oriented bayesian networks to model linkage, linkage disequilibrium and mutations between STR markers.
    Kling D; Egeland T; Mostad P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43873. PubMed ID: 22984448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of a novel estimator of linkage disequilibrium.
    Gianola D; Qanbari S; Simianer H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Oct; 111(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 23921642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of linkage disequilibrium on linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees.
    Levinson DF; Holmans P
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. PubMed ID: 16451672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies.
    Nsengimana J; Bishop DT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():237-62. PubMed ID: 22307702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pairwise kinship inference and pedigree reconstruction using 91 microhaplotypes.
    Wei Y; Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Li X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhang J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Sep; 72():103090. PubMed ID: 38968912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AUCP: An indicator for system effectiveness of panels in pairwise distant kinship identification.
    Ma G; Cong B; Li S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110539. PubMed ID: 33142188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Linkage mapping methods applied to the COGA data set: presentation Group 4 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 14.
    Daw EW; Doan BQ; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S29-34. PubMed ID: 16342182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relationship inference from the genetic data on parents or offspring: A comparative study.
    Gazal S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():31-8. PubMed ID: 26431644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Utility of ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in the research of pairwise 2nd-degree kinship identification.
    Xu M; Du Q; Ma G; Chen Z; Liu Q; Fu L; Cong B; Li S
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30687898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Joint inference of identity by descent along multiple chromosomes from population samples.
    Zheng C; Kuhner MK; Thompson EA
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):185-200. PubMed ID: 24606562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. FamLinkX - implementation of a general model for likelihood computations for X-chromosomal marker data.
    Kling D; Dell'Amico B; Tillmar AO
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():1-7. PubMed ID: 25771099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
    Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.